Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Violation After Violation.......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 611240" data-attributes="member: 198"><p><a href="http://makeupsdeliver.org/news.php?extend.243" target="_blank">http://makeupsdeliver.org/news.php?extend.243</a></p><p></p><p>I don't see how even the most anti-union UPS employee can look at this and not get pissed off. I'm not what you'd call a die hard union guy by no stretch of the imagination but I do believe that all contracts should be honored. The over 9.5 violations seem to be the main focus of discussion whenever this topic comes up but some of the other violations are just as blatant. Below is an example of one that caught my eye. </p><p></p><p><strong>"<em>Local 340 v. UPS, South Portland, ME On behalf of Jonathan Larkin, Union alleges that the Company violated Articles 17 and 41, claiming that the grievant was required to work a 30-month progression while contract requirements are to only serve a 24- month progression.</em>"</strong></p><p></p><p>This one kind of hits home because I have a feeling that they are going to try and pull this one on me and a couple of other guys in my center. Should be interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 611240, member: 198"] [url]http://makeupsdeliver.org/news.php?extend.243[/url] I don't see how even the most anti-union UPS employee can look at this and not get pissed off. I'm not what you'd call a die hard union guy by no stretch of the imagination but I do believe that all contracts should be honored. The over 9.5 violations seem to be the main focus of discussion whenever this topic comes up but some of the other violations are just as blatant. Below is an example of one that caught my eye. [b]"[i]Local 340 v. UPS, South Portland, ME On behalf of Jonathan Larkin, Union alleges that the Company violated Articles 17 and 41, claiming that the grievant was required to work a 30-month progression while contract requirements are to only serve a 24- month progression.[/i]"[/b] This one kind of hits home because I have a feeling that they are going to try and pull this one on me and a couple of other guys in my center. Should be interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Violation After Violation.......
Top