Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
VOTE NO T-shirts!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Liberty Bear" data-source="post: 257089" data-attributes="member: 12147"><p>I think you're a little paranoid. It's common knowledge that forums and blogs can be used to publicize both ideas and websites. That's why many webmasters and web publishers launch their own blogs or forums and/or post on other people's forums. This is very common knowledge, and it's a very common practice. There's nothing sinister about it.</p><p></p><p>Indeed, many forum owners are happy to be part of a network where people discuss and link to each other's websites or forums. In fact, I'm in the process of creating a webpage focusing on the UPS/Teamsters contract, and I had planned on linking to MakeUPSDeliver.org, TDU and BrownCafe.com.</p><p></p><p>As I stated in my other post, IF your regulations don't allow members to include links in their signatures, your terms should clearly point that out. If your terms DO state that, and I missed it, then I'm at fault. Either way, I'll gladly remove my links if they violate your terms.</p><p></p><p>But you can't have it both ways. You can't allow members to include links in their signatures, then turn around and condemn someone for including links in their signatures.</p><p></p><p>So which is it: Are your members allowed to include links in their signatures or not? Does my signature in any way violate any of your terms of service?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Liberty Bear, post: 257089, member: 12147"] I think you're a little paranoid. It's common knowledge that forums and blogs can be used to publicize both ideas and websites. That's why many webmasters and web publishers launch their own blogs or forums and/or post on other people's forums. This is very common knowledge, and it's a very common practice. There's nothing sinister about it. Indeed, many forum owners are happy to be part of a network where people discuss and link to each other's websites or forums. In fact, I'm in the process of creating a webpage focusing on the UPS/Teamsters contract, and I had planned on linking to MakeUPSDeliver.org, TDU and BrownCafe.com. As I stated in my other post, IF your regulations don't allow members to include links in their signatures, your terms should clearly point that out. If your terms DO state that, and I missed it, then I'm at fault. Either way, I'll gladly remove my links if they violate your terms. But you can't have it both ways. You can't allow members to include links in their signatures, then turn around and condemn someone for including links in their signatures. So which is it: Are your members allowed to include links in their signatures or not? Does my signature in any way violate any of your terms of service? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
VOTE NO T-shirts!
Top