Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Washington Post Slam
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tworavens" data-source="post: 580181" data-attributes="member: 22946"><p>Thanks for your views.</p><p></p><p>While I admit that the scenario you portray is plausible, I guess I am not enough of a Machiavellian thinker to believe it's likely. Or maybe I'm just naive. Perhaps I am just hoping that in the 21st century a company can conduct business ethically and still remain profitable, without plowing under the employees who make it possible.</p><p></p><p>I do not disagree with your assessment of the Teamsters' greed, nor that of UPS. I do question whether the quid pro quo you suggest is the most likely outcome.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would say that's true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tworavens, post: 580181, member: 22946"] Thanks for your views. While I admit that the scenario you portray is plausible, I guess I am not enough of a Machiavellian thinker to believe it's likely. Or maybe I'm just naive. Perhaps I am just hoping that in the 21st century a company can conduct business ethically and still remain profitable, without plowing under the employees who make it possible. I do not disagree with your assessment of the Teamsters' greed, nor that of UPS. I do question whether the quid pro quo you suggest is the most likely outcome. I would say that's true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Washington Post Slam
Top