Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
We The Sheeple!!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 268155" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Brazen,</p><p> </p><p>I didn't watch the debate but I did catch the highlights on SportsCenter uh I mean CNN. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /> Did you every feel watching news coverage of the political process was like watching the post game coverage on ESPN as they analyse every move and word spoken to see when points are scored? Throw some cheerleaders up there and a good halftime show and you wouldn't know the difference!</p><p> </p><p>Anyway, I did see several clips where Con Job Johnny used the word Neo-Con. He came off like a 10 year old who had just learned from his peers the bad words <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> or Dam* and was just using them because in his mind it made him look cool. And of course there are those who hear those words and think, "he's one of us!" so there you go. Several polls are saying Hillary is slipping and Obama stumbled so the guy to pick it up obviously is Con Job Johnny. </p><p> </p><p>What is more interesting to watch is how nastier and nastier the democrat tug of war is getting and some of them (Hillary's camp the biggest) is crying foul and not fair. Cowboy up winnies because you think it's bad now, wait until the general and the repubs get it going and this time they have absolutely nothing to lose and everyone including the current sitting President believe the dems will take it with Hillary in the King's seat come Nov. 08'.</p><p> </p><p>Also very good link on Ron Silver. Even though Ron and I would disagree on a few matters I do completely admire the guy. It takes a pretty principled individual to stand up in the middle of a crowd that you know disagrees and deliver a very contarian POV. I should know RIGHT!<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /> </p><p>Then again, Ron is an actor and he wasn't exactly knocking down the big box office scores and some PR to put him in the spotlight might be worth something and along with my contarian POV I'm also a very cynical SOB too! <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p>I may not agree with his POV but I'm always a huge admirer of Free Speech and Free Thought and within a certain sphere in which he travels he certainly is a ground pounder. Go Ron, love ya for it! I'd also add Dennis Miller and Tom Selleck to that mix as well. Love Tom and his tradition of western movies. I'm a sucker for em'! But I also love the dark westerns like High Plains Drifter too where the bad guy is really the good guy in the end. Uh think Dick Cheney and Richard Perle anyone! LMAO!!!!!! </p><p> </p><p>I also noticed Ron (being a self admitted "Neo-Con" in a tongue and cheek way) made mention of admiring the likes of Wilson, FDR, Truman, Kennedy which in traditional paleo Conservatism circles were considered anathema when it came to political public policy and leadership ideals. They were considered the globalist, internationalist, etc. of their day which it's ironic conservatives of the time and many republicans stood in total opposition too. Funny how in our current day those same folks are now held up as standards to follow in the now present conservative movement.</p><p> </p><p>Here's an interesting thought for ya. 60 to 80 years from now, will conservatives of that time, let's say the republicans in 2080', will they hold up Hillary and Bill as leadership icons? You just jumped 10 feet into the air but just remember this. In Wilson and FDR's day, they were just as hated by the conservative side of their day as Bill and Hillary are in our day. Truman left office with a 20 something % total approval rating and is now considered by most people as not only a good President but in a lot of quarters, a great President. Even among republicans.</p><p> </p><p>Being in my 50's and barring unforeseen medical advances, I doubt I will be around to see this but some of you will, global warming and intersellar impacts not withstanding. Do me a favor, remember my words because history and human nature is a funny thing and the trends just suggest I'm gonna be right and I'll be humble when you come groveling!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Lol :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> at me!</p><p> </p><p>To quote the great baseball catcher Crash Davis: "Here comes the duce so when you speak of me, speak of me well!"</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/thumbup1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbup1:" title="Thumbup1 :thumbup1:" data-shortname=":thumbup1:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 268155, member: 2189"] Brazen, I didn't watch the debate but I did catch the highlights on SportsCenter uh I mean CNN. :wink2: Did you every feel watching news coverage of the political process was like watching the post game coverage on ESPN as they analyse every move and word spoken to see when points are scored? Throw some cheerleaders up there and a good halftime show and you wouldn't know the difference! Anyway, I did see several clips where Con Job Johnny used the word Neo-Con. He came off like a 10 year old who had just learned from his peers the bad words :censored: or Dam* and was just using them because in his mind it made him look cool. And of course there are those who hear those words and think, "he's one of us!" so there you go. Several polls are saying Hillary is slipping and Obama stumbled so the guy to pick it up obviously is Con Job Johnny. What is more interesting to watch is how nastier and nastier the democrat tug of war is getting and some of them (Hillary's camp the biggest) is crying foul and not fair. Cowboy up winnies because you think it's bad now, wait until the general and the repubs get it going and this time they have absolutely nothing to lose and everyone including the current sitting President believe the dems will take it with Hillary in the King's seat come Nov. 08'. Also very good link on Ron Silver. Even though Ron and I would disagree on a few matters I do completely admire the guy. It takes a pretty principled individual to stand up in the middle of a crowd that you know disagrees and deliver a very contarian POV. I should know RIGHT!:happy-very: Then again, Ron is an actor and he wasn't exactly knocking down the big box office scores and some PR to put him in the spotlight might be worth something and along with my contarian POV I'm also a very cynical SOB too! :happy-very: I may not agree with his POV but I'm always a huge admirer of Free Speech and Free Thought and within a certain sphere in which he travels he certainly is a ground pounder. Go Ron, love ya for it! I'd also add Dennis Miller and Tom Selleck to that mix as well. Love Tom and his tradition of western movies. I'm a sucker for em'! But I also love the dark westerns like High Plains Drifter too where the bad guy is really the good guy in the end. Uh think Dick Cheney and Richard Perle anyone! LMAO!!!!!! I also noticed Ron (being a self admitted "Neo-Con" in a tongue and cheek way) made mention of admiring the likes of Wilson, FDR, Truman, Kennedy which in traditional paleo Conservatism circles were considered anathema when it came to political public policy and leadership ideals. They were considered the globalist, internationalist, etc. of their day which it's ironic conservatives of the time and many republicans stood in total opposition too. Funny how in our current day those same folks are now held up as standards to follow in the now present conservative movement. Here's an interesting thought for ya. 60 to 80 years from now, will conservatives of that time, let's say the republicans in 2080', will they hold up Hillary and Bill as leadership icons? You just jumped 10 feet into the air but just remember this. In Wilson and FDR's day, they were just as hated by the conservative side of their day as Bill and Hillary are in our day. Truman left office with a 20 something % total approval rating and is now considered by most people as not only a good President but in a lot of quarters, a great President. Even among republicans. Being in my 50's and barring unforeseen medical advances, I doubt I will be around to see this but some of you will, global warming and intersellar impacts not withstanding. Do me a favor, remember my words because history and human nature is a funny thing and the trends just suggest I'm gonna be right and I'll be humble when you come groveling! :lol: at me! To quote the great baseball catcher Crash Davis: "Here comes the duce so when you speak of me, speak of me well!" :thumbup1: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
We The Sheeple!!!!
Top