Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 410410" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p><span style="color: blue">Dilli , </span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">You have clearly misunderstood me. I'm not trying to be entertaining here. The morals applied in this case are not consistent. You would tell me to fry the guy if you knew he stole it. But because he bought stolen goods we are supposed to look the other way.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">You don't buy a brand new Blackberry for a 100 bucks unless its hot. This is one of those deals where the union can defend the guy by saying he did not know he was buying hot goods at an 80 percent discount.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">The law is different , if you're in possession you're guilty. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">If you're going to defend the receiver of stolen goods then you might as well just give him your valuables because you are condoning thievery.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">I have no use for thievery and I will not condone it. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">I respect the fact that Red did his job defending the guy but comon red don't make excuses for him , he knew he was buying hot merchandise.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 410410, member: 1912"] [COLOR=blue]Dilli , [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]You have clearly misunderstood me. I'm not trying to be entertaining here. The morals applied in this case are not consistent. You would tell me to fry the guy if you knew he stole it. But because he bought stolen goods we are supposed to look the other way.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]You don't buy a brand new Blackberry for a 100 bucks unless its hot. This is one of those deals where the union can defend the guy by saying he did not know he was buying hot goods at an 80 percent discount.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]The law is different , if you're in possession you're guilty. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]If you're going to defend the receiver of stolen goods then you might as well just give him your valuables because you are condoning thievery.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]I have no use for thievery and I will not condone it. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]I respect the fact that Red did his job defending the guy but comon red don't make excuses for him , he knew he was buying hot merchandise.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
Top