Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 412090" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Lets break this whole thing down to the basics;</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The employee was NOT caught stealing. He bought a phone which later proved to be stolen by a different employee, who had NOT yet been caught or accused of theft.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The employee voluntarily registered the phone...with serial#....with the Loss Prevention department of the company from whom he supposedly stole it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Posession of stolen goods is not in and of itself a crime. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to prove that you KNEW it was stolen. There must be criminal intent. If you buy a ring at a pawnshop or used jewelry store, and the ring is subsequently proven to have been stolen, you are not guilty of a crime.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">A grievance panel...composed of equal union AND management representatives...decided to give this employee his job back.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Upon what basis then....does a company pursue criminal charges against an employee who has been determined by a panel of its own representatives to be NOT GUILTY of the crime?</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 412090, member: 14668"] Lets break this whole thing down to the basics; [LIST=1] [*]The employee was NOT caught stealing. He bought a phone which later proved to be stolen by a different employee, who had NOT yet been caught or accused of theft. [*]The employee voluntarily registered the phone...with serial#....with the Loss Prevention department of the company from whom he supposedly stole it. [*]Posession of stolen goods is not in and of itself a crime. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to prove that you KNEW it was stolen. There must be criminal intent. If you buy a ring at a pawnshop or used jewelry store, and the ring is subsequently proven to have been stolen, you are not guilty of a crime. [*]A grievance panel...composed of equal union AND management representatives...decided to give this employee his job back. [*]Upon what basis then....does a company pursue criminal charges against an employee who has been determined by a panel of its own representatives to be NOT GUILTY of the crime? [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
Top