Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 432796" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>other</p><p> </p><p>red is not the legal agent for the guy. he has lawyers. but red is very involved in the process, which helps.</p><p> </p><p>i beg to differ. i was involved in a case where the person that made the charges to the district attorneys office, lied to the grand jury, which handed down the warrants. all on the word of the "upstanding citizen". they never investigated it themselves. after bumping the case around for two years, it was dropped when at the final hearing the upstanding citizen did not show along with the other credible witnesses. there was no hard evidence to show what they alleged was true. to the contrary.</p><p> </p><p>now, in this case, ups brings the case to the da. the da, on ups's word alone brings up the charges. never investigates, after all, ups's loss prevention did that, right?</p><p>your time line is off base. it would seem you have a penchant for putting a spin on the basic truth, to get to your version that you intend to believe as the truth.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 432796, member: 484"] other red is not the legal agent for the guy. he has lawyers. but red is very involved in the process, which helps. i beg to differ. i was involved in a case where the person that made the charges to the district attorneys office, lied to the grand jury, which handed down the warrants. all on the word of the "upstanding citizen". they never investigated it themselves. after bumping the case around for two years, it was dropped when at the final hearing the upstanding citizen did not show along with the other credible witnesses. there was no hard evidence to show what they alleged was true. to the contrary. now, in this case, ups brings the case to the da. the da, on ups's word alone brings up the charges. never investigates, after all, ups's loss prevention did that, right? your time line is off base. it would seem you have a penchant for putting a spin on the basic truth, to get to your version that you intend to believe as the truth. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
Top