Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
whats the best way to deal with this new "push" on production? on production.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 511695" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>Wornout:</p><p> </p><p>Yes, and No... I'll try and explain....</p><p> </p><p>I posted earlier about the "tools" that your center team needs. Its their job to work with you and the preload to improve performance (if it needs improving).</p><p> </p><p>I said before that the real problem is that UPS has inappropriately made the driver the cause of overallowed. Overallowed is meant to say that something is wrong. Not WHO is the cause.</p><p> </p><p>The cause can be the preload, traffic, poor load, misloads, etc. The cause can also be bad work measurement. (Of corse, it can be the driver too)</p><p> </p><p>Its the responsibility of the center team, to show you how to run the standard, not IE. From my perspective it comes down to an effective OJS ride. </p><p> </p><p>If during an OJS ride you are told that you're following methods, working at a good pace, and making good decisions, then any overallowed is not you, but problems with the work measurement.</p><p> </p><p>Now, you may say that during the OJS ride, you have a better dispatch and better load and that is the reason for better performance. I don't have a disagreement with that. It ony proves my point that work measurement just points out that a problem exists, not who the cause is.</p><p> </p><p>If you look at driver performance across the country during an OJS ride, its significantly better than the average. Its the center teams job to maintain that.</p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 511695, member: 927"] Wornout: Yes, and No... I'll try and explain.... I posted earlier about the "tools" that your center team needs. Its their job to work with you and the preload to improve performance (if it needs improving). I said before that the real problem is that UPS has inappropriately made the driver the cause of overallowed. Overallowed is meant to say that something is wrong. Not WHO is the cause. The cause can be the preload, traffic, poor load, misloads, etc. The cause can also be bad work measurement. (Of corse, it can be the driver too) Its the responsibility of the center team, to show you how to run the standard, not IE. From my perspective it comes down to an effective OJS ride. If during an OJS ride you are told that you're following methods, working at a good pace, and making good decisions, then any overallowed is not you, but problems with the work measurement. Now, you may say that during the OJS ride, you have a better dispatch and better load and that is the reason for better performance. I don't have a disagreement with that. It ony proves my point that work measurement just points out that a problem exists, not who the cause is. If you look at driver performance across the country during an OJS ride, its significantly better than the average. Its the center teams job to maintain that. P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
whats the best way to deal with this new "push" on production? on production.
Top