Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Whats the latest on the contract
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PiedmontSteward" data-source="post: 1293305" data-attributes="member: 42270"><p>There's also a big issue with parity. UPS isn't going to give Ohio/West PA/Louisville/Philly anything economically significant in comparison with the other supplements as far as wages and fringe benefits are concerned. IBT also doesn't want to "reward" the dissidents in those areas for voting down their supplements and holding up a national contract. But there could be some big compromises on language. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the focus should be on clearing up the mess with 22.3 jobs. Negotiate the right to force the company to maintain the same level of combo jobs in the same facility/local, require that they be bid out within 30 days of vacancy, and keep them from playing the shell game where a job opens up and it gets hidden somewhere halfway across the country. </p><p></p><p>2,350 new combo jobs doesn't mean <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> with the current language we have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PiedmontSteward, post: 1293305, member: 42270"] There's also a big issue with parity. UPS isn't going to give Ohio/West PA/Louisville/Philly anything economically significant in comparison with the other supplements as far as wages and fringe benefits are concerned. IBT also doesn't want to "reward" the dissidents in those areas for voting down their supplements and holding up a national contract. But there could be some big compromises on language. Personally, I think the focus should be on clearing up the mess with 22.3 jobs. Negotiate the right to force the company to maintain the same level of combo jobs in the same facility/local, require that they be bid out within 30 days of vacancy, and keep them from playing the shell game where a job opens up and it gets hidden somewhere halfway across the country. 2,350 new combo jobs doesn't mean :censored: with the current language we have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Whats the latest on the contract
Top