Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Who are you voting for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="By The Book" data-source="post: 2409959" data-attributes="member: 53581"><p>NMA article 37 paragraph c page 121, contract dated December 19, 2007 thru July 31, 2013. This language was one of the reasons that this contract passed. Language that was easy to implement and enforce. This language was honored for about one cycle, January thru October of 2008. Then the company wouldn't post the lists stating there was a decision or agreement between the parties that gave UPS the right to use a process that basically mirrors the current NMA article 37 language in paragraph c on page 129.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="By The Book, post: 2409959, member: 53581"] NMA article 37 paragraph c page 121, contract dated December 19, 2007 thru July 31, 2013. This language was one of the reasons that this contract passed. Language that was easy to implement and enforce. This language was honored for about one cycle, January thru October of 2008. Then the company wouldn't post the lists stating there was a decision or agreement between the parties that gave UPS the right to use a process that basically mirrors the current NMA article 37 language in paragraph c on page 129. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Who are you voting for?
Top