Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Why Obama May Be a One Termer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 433478" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>When Reagan took office it wasn't a bed of roses and he went 2 terms. I remember in early Sept. just weeks before the 1980' election closing on a house and getting a 12% interest loan and thinking I'd hit the lottery. </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p>FDR took over from Hoover and went 4 terms himself so there may be some exceptons to that rule. Otherwise thinking off the top of my head, you may be right. Then again Bush 1 was handed a pretty good economy and by the time he left it had stumbled some giving an opening to Clinton that he used all the way to the White House. Depending on who you ask Clinton took over a bad economy but there are those that argue it had already turned the corner. In a technical sense, it had but what mattered is what the voter thought as they had the last say.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 433478, member: 2189"] When Reagan took office it wasn't a bed of roses and he went 2 terms. I remember in early Sept. just weeks before the 1980' election closing on a house and getting a 12% interest loan and thinking I'd hit the lottery. :happy-very: FDR took over from Hoover and went 4 terms himself so there may be some exceptons to that rule. Otherwise thinking off the top of my head, you may be right. Then again Bush 1 was handed a pretty good economy and by the time he left it had stumbled some giving an opening to Clinton that he used all the way to the White House. Depending on who you ask Clinton took over a bad economy but there are those that argue it had already turned the corner. In a technical sense, it had but what mattered is what the voter thought as they had the last say. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Why Obama May Be a One Termer
Top