Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
WMDs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 97553" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>IF that is actually the case, then why all the hoopla about those chemical weapons we had to dispose of a decade or two ago. It would seem that if they are indeed harmless, then I guess we got snookered?</p><p> </p><p>As to the wilki definition of WMD, a person then can go into a crowded movie cinema with a loaded AK47 and empty the gun several times then that would make it a WMD.</p><p> </p><p>Also, according to the explanation, in a small rural town, a 9MM pistol could also be a WMD, because it too could very easily cause enough casualties to overwhelm the medical and law enforcement for that area.</p><p> </p><p>So you are saying, with those quotes, that it all depends on where and how the WMD's are used. As long as it causes enough health problems to overwhelm the responding services.</p><p> </p><p>I would then also expect for you to admit that a car bomb that kills 60 and wound 150 would also meet your criteria for a WMD.</p><p> </p><p>So I rest my case. Those shells have the capability, or at the very least had, to be used as WMD's. And of course we all know that he did use WMD's as he saw fit. On his own people no less.</p><p> </p><p>Oh and by the way, two planes knocking down two buildings also qualify as WMD's. But you would rather we not bring that up, would you.</p><p> </p><p>Have a happy fourth. I am sure your effigy of bush will burn brightly.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 97553, member: 484"] IF that is actually the case, then why all the hoopla about those chemical weapons we had to dispose of a decade or two ago. It would seem that if they are indeed harmless, then I guess we got snookered? As to the wilki definition of WMD, a person then can go into a crowded movie cinema with a loaded AK47 and empty the gun several times then that would make it a WMD. Also, according to the explanation, in a small rural town, a 9MM pistol could also be a WMD, because it too could very easily cause enough casualties to overwhelm the medical and law enforcement for that area. So you are saying, with those quotes, that it all depends on where and how the WMD's are used. As long as it causes enough health problems to overwhelm the responding services. I would then also expect for you to admit that a car bomb that kills 60 and wound 150 would also meet your criteria for a WMD. So I rest my case. Those shells have the capability, or at the very least had, to be used as WMD's. And of course we all know that he did use WMD's as he saw fit. On his own people no less. Oh and by the way, two planes knocking down two buildings also qualify as WMD's. But you would rather we not bring that up, would you. Have a happy fourth. I am sure your effigy of bush will burn brightly. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
WMDs
Top