Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
You tell em Donald
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 2598982" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>It is a step in the right direction. I have never said otherwise. </p><p></p><p>My question is what about after FWA? I mean if we were only able to cut that and cut 100% of it (probably not possible) is it "good enough" to only saddle future generations with $480,000,000,000 worth of debt per year? If not, (I would say it's not) then how do you cut taxes enough to spur growth to increase tax revenue to cover not only the tax cut but also the $480,000,000,000 debt? I suggest it isn't possible and thus ask what draconian cuts are we willing to make?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bbsam, post: 2598982, member: 22662"] It is a step in the right direction. I have never said otherwise. My question is what about after FWA? I mean if we were only able to cut that and cut 100% of it (probably not possible) is it "good enough" to only saddle future generations with $480,000,000,000 worth of debt per year? If not, (I would say it's not) then how do you cut taxes enough to spur growth to increase tax revenue to cover not only the tax cut but also the $480,000,000,000 debt? I suggest it isn't possible and thus ask what draconian cuts are we willing to make? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
You tell em Donald
Top