Palin Quits as Alaskan Governor - Page 3 - Brown Cafe

UPS Lifer · 07-07-2009, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jones

Hmmm, not sure what you are referencing. I basically said that Biden was a lousy presidential candidate and therefore comparing him to Palin was of little consequence.

My heartfelt apology!

OK! I am on drugs! I read it to fast!

I promise to read slower next time. I better start wearing edible shoes! LOL!

Jones · 07-07-2009, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UPS Lifer

My heartfelt apology!

OK! I am on drugs! I read it to fast!

I promise to read slower next time. I better start wearing edible shoes! LOL!

You were in such a hurry to take a shot at 'ol jonesy that you jumped the gun! I forgive you

.

And Brett, here's something to cheer you up:

Quote:

Obama in trouble in a key swing state

The president's approval rating drops below 50 percent in Ohio
Alex Koppelman
Jul. 07, 2009 |
Bad news for President Obama, and for Ohio Democrats: The president's approval rating in that pivotal swing state has fallen to 49 percent, according to a Quinnipiac survey released Tuesday.

Obviously, Obama's approval rating this far out from the next presidential election, and even the 2010 midterms, isn't a great predictor of anything. But it does appear to be a sign of how the nation's economic woes are beginning to affect him politically, and the hit he and other Democrats could take if the economy doesn't start to show real improvement soon.

So far, the White House is dismissing the poll as an outlier, saying more data is needed. That's a fair point, obviously, but there's more support for this result than the Obama team wants to admit. This is part of a trend in Quinnipiac's polling of Ohio -- Obama's approval rating has been dropping fast in their surveys in that state -- and at the end of last month, Public Policy Polling had the president's approval at 51 percent.

Nationally, Obama's still doing well, with Real Clear Politics' average of his approval rating as measured by various pollsters holding at 58 percent. But the states individually matter much more than any national polling.

brett636 · 07-08-2009, 01:19 AM

This was in our local paper. I think it fits this situation well.

JimJimmyJames · 07-08-2009, 07:54 AM

I am amazed how many miles this thread has traveled so far.

I mean, do Republicans really want to draw their line in the sand with her using the stick?

wkmac · 07-08-2009, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimJimmyJames

I am amazed how many miles this thread has traveled so far.

I mean, do Republicans really want to draw their line in the sand with her using the stick?

Since all men are pigs and it's becoming harder and harder to find a republican male who hasn't screwed everything not nailed down, maybe they're grasping at Palin with the idea that she's not a skirt chaser.

OMG! You don't think her resignation was......

Let's hope Sarah has learned from the brutal abuse & raping she's took from McCain, the GOP and the Monster and she can return to those independent roots from which she came.

YouTube - Sarah Palin and the Alaska Independence Party. Palin addresses AIP convention

If only more leaders had this courage, openess and ideal of people making their own individual free choices. A political society of free and open competition. How so refreshing and I'll give her that but then when you hold to principles rather than a dominate position of protecting party, you can afford such freedom. Hope for Palin's sake, she can rediscover that of herself.

Good luck to her.

tourists24 · 07-08-2009, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimJimmyJames

I am amazed how many miles this thread has traveled so far.

I mean, do Republicans really want to draw their line in the sand with her using the stick?

No, but some conservatives are hopeful

brett636 · 07-09-2009, 01:12 AM

I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin
The Republicans bring a knife to a gunfight, and lose again.

By David Kahane

One of the most terrifying moments of my political life came last summer at the Republican convention in St. Paul. No, I don’t mean seeing John McCain careering around the Xcel Energy Center like Eyegore in Young Frankenstein, his face frozen in a Lon Chaney Sr. rictus grin as he reached across the aisle to his erstwhile friends in the media and got his hand bitten off. Rather, I’m referring to the aftermath of Sarah Palin’s outrageous acceptance speech, which whipped up the Rotary Club delegates into a frenzy of white-boy fury that not even heckling by a brave Code Pink embed could deter. Truly a fascist classic and one that sent shivers down our collectivist spines.

Even worse was the glaze of horror on the phizzes of the assembled heroes of the Mainstream Media. Andrea Mitchell — yes, the very same Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, whose employer saw no conflict of interest at all when she married then Fed pooh-bah Alan Greenspan — stood there gaping like a frog while the rest of the assembled Finemans and Matthewses and Olbermanns scurried around like roaches when the light gets turned on: What the hell just hit us? For one horrible moment, it looked as if the carefully crafted plans of David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, George Soros, and the Second Chief Directorate, first department, of the old KGB were about to gang agley.

Not only were we offended at the sheer effrontery of McCain’s pick: How dare the Republicans proffer this déclassée piece of Wasilla trailer trash whose only claim to fame was that she didn’t exercise her right to choose? Where were her degrees from Smith or Barnard, her internships at PETA, the Brookings Institution, or the Young Pioneers? We were also outraged that the Stupid Party had just nominated a completely unqualified candidate nobody had ever heard of, a first-term governor of Alaska whose previous experience consisted of a small-town mayoralty. As opposed to our guy, Barry Soetoro of Mombasa, Djakarta, and Honolulu, a first-term senator nobody had ever heard of, whose previous experience had been as a state senator (D., Daley Machine) in Illinois. After eight long, illegitimate, lawless years of &*^%BUSH$#@! tyranny, how dare you contest this election?

And so the word went out, from that time and place: Eviscerate Sarah Palin like one of her field-dressed moose. Turn her life upside down. Attack her politics, her background, her educational history. Attack her family. Make fun of her husband, her children. Unleash the noted gynecologist Andrew Sullivan to prove that Palin’s fifth child was really her grandchild. Hit her with everything we have: Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, taking a beer-run break from her quixotic search for Mr. Right to drip venom on Sister Sarah; post-funny comic David Letterman, to joke about her and her daughters on national television; Katie Couric, the anchor nobody watches, to give this Alaskan interloper a taste of life in the big leagues; former New York Times hack Todd “Mr. Dee Dee Myers” Purdum, to act as an instrument of Graydon Carter’s wrath at Vanity Fair. Heck, we even burned her church down. Even after the teleological triumph of The One, the assault had to continue, each blow delivered with our Lefty SneerTM (viz.: Donny Deutsch yesterday on Morning Joe), until Sarah was finished.

You know what? It worked! McCain finally succumbed to his long-standing case of Stockholm Syndrome (“My friends, you have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency”), Tina Fey turned Palin into a see-Russia-from-my-house joke, “conservative” useful idiots like Peggy Noonan and Kathleen Parker hatched her, and finally Sarah cried No más and walked away. If we could, we’d cut off her head and mount it on a wall at Tammany Hall, except there is no more Tammany Hall unless you count Obama’s Tony Rezko–financed home in Chicago. And it took only eight months — heck, Sarah couldn't even have another kid in the time it took us to destroy her. That’s the Chicago way!

Yes, my friends, it’s once again time to quote Sean Connery’s famous speech from The Untouchables, written by David Mamet — the lecture the veteran Chicago cop gives a wet-behind-the-ears Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner, back when he was a movie star) while they sit in a church pew. “You want to get Capone? Here’s how you get him: he pulls a knife, you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!” If you just think of us — liberal Democrats — as Capone you’ll begin to understand what we’re up to. And we just put one of yours in the morgue.

I don’t know why I’m telling you this, but maybe now you’re beginning to understand the high-stakes game we’re playing here. This ain’t John McCain’s logrolling senatorial club any more. This is a deadly serious attempt to realize the vision of the 1960s and to fundamentally transform the United States of America. This is the fusion of Communist dogma, high ideals, gangster tactics, and a stunning amount of self-loathing. For the first time in history, the patrician class is deliberately selling its own country down the river just to prove a point: that, yes, we can! This country stinks and we won’t be happy until we’ve forced you to admit it.

In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. We’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Emperor Barack Hussein Obama II. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.

If you had any sense, you would start using our tactics against us. After all, you have a few lawyers on your side. Sue us. File frivolous ethics complaints against all our elected officials until, like Sarah, they go broke from defending themselves. (David Paterson would be a good place to start.) Challenge the constitutionality of BO2’s legion of fill-in-the-blank czars — none of whom have to be confirmed, or even pass a security check. (Come to think of it, neither did Barry.) Let slip your own journalistic dogs of war, assuming you have any, to find Barry’s birth certificate, his college transcripts, whether he applied to Occidental as a foreign student, and on which passport he traveled in 1981 to Pakistan with his friend Wahid Hamid, for starters.

You might also want to think about interviewing New York literary agent Jane Dystel, who a) contacted the totally unknown Obama in the wake of an adulatory New York Times piece in 1990 and b) got him a $125,000 advance for a memoir that c) he couldn’t write, even after a long sojourn in Bali, which d) got the contract canceled, whereupon e) Dystel got him $40,000 from another publisher, following which f) the book finally came out to glowing reviews and g) Obama fired her. Wouldn’t she have an interesting story to tell?

Of course, you won’t. You’re too nice, too enamored of history and tradition to realize that the rules have changed. Remember, I live and work in a town where, “Hello, he lied,” isn’t a joke; we men of the Left are perfectly comfortable lying, cheating, and stealing — hello, Senator Franken! — in order to attain and keep political power. Not for nothing is one of our mottos, “By Any Means Necessary.” You see, we’re the good guys, and for us the ends always justify the means. We are, literally, shameless, which is why Bill Clinton is now a multi-millionaire and Eliot Spitzer is already on the comeback trail.

In Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, “the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.” This is the book that “Reset” Rodham (what ever happened to her?) and BHO II grew up reading and continue to live by. If you don’t understand that that’s the way we see you — as the enemy — then you’re too dumb to survive. Remember that for us politics is not just an avocation, or even just a job, but our life. We literally stay awake nights thinking up ways to screw you. And one of the ways we do that is by religiously observing Alinsky’s Rule No. 4.

Did Sarah stand for “family values”? Flay her unwed-mother daughter. Did she represent probity in a notoriously corrupt, one-family state? Spread rumors about FBI investigations. Did she speak with an upper-Midwest twang? Mock it relentlessly on Saturday Night Live. Above all, don’t let her motivate the half of the country that doesn’t want His Serene Highness to bankrupt the nation, align with banana-republic Communist dictators, unilaterally dismantle our missile defenses, and set foot in more mosques than churches since he has become president. We’ve got a suicide cult to run here.

brett636 · 07-09-2009, 01:13 AM

And that’s why Sarah had to go. Whether she understood it or not, she threatened us right down to our most fundamental, meretricious, elitist, sneering, snobbish, insecure, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders bones. She was, after all, a “normal” American, the kind of person (or so I’m told) you meet in flyover country. The kind that worries first about home and hearth and believes in things like motherhood and love of country the way it is, not the way she wants to remake it.

What you clowns need, in other words, is a Rules for Radical Conservatives to explain what you’re up against and teach you how to compete before it’s too late. Luckily, since I care about money even more than I care about politics, I have just such a book in the proposal stage, currently making the rounds of various publishers, assuming any of them are wise enough to take me up on it.

And, yes, this time it really is personal.

wkmac · 07-09-2009, 02:42 AM

You know, if I were a good, loyal republican like many of you here, I'd find the source of that kind of tripe and put them out of business. Someone who would write stuff like that is just anti-american!

Always be honest enough to source link the material and it also keeps potential copyright problems down for the website owners. Nuff Said!

brett636 · 07-09-2009, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wkmac

You know, if I were a good, loyal republican like many of you here, I'd find the source of that kind of tripe and put them out of business. Someone who would write stuff like that is just anti-american!

Always be honest enough to source link the material and it also keeps potential copyright problems down for the website owners. Nuff Said!

good idea

http://article.nationalreview.com/pr...I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=

tieguy · 07-09-2009, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimJimmyJames

I am amazed how many miles this thread has traveled so far.

I mean, do Republicans really want to draw their line in the sand with her using the stick?

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

pickup · 07-09-2009, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tieguy

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

Oh, boy, you're gonna get it and I know who is gonna give it to you, that is if she drops by the current events section.

ajblakejr · 07-09-2009, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brett636

I could live with a President Romney,

Mee Toooo!!!

JimJimmyJames · 07-09-2009, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tieguy

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

What, you don't find Pelosi cute?

tieguy · 07-10-2009, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimJimmyJames

What, you don't find Pelosi cute?

I think she could be , I don't really care for the sixties hair do and glasses.

moreluck · 07-10-2009, 04:42 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimJimmyJames

What, you don't find Pelosi cute?

p
E =peculiar

L
O
S = loser

I = incredibly ugly !

rod · 07-10-2009, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tieguy

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

I knew if I hung around long enough I would find something I could agree with tieguy on

moreluck · 07-10-2009, 05:54 AM

Tie & Rod,

With your requirements, Kim Kardashian could be president ! Or better yet, Kendra!! Go Kendra, go Kendra !!

Baba gounj · 07-10-2009, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tieguy

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rod

I knew if I hung around long enough I would find something I could agree with tieguy on

I'm with you guys

wkmac · 07-10-2009, 08:50 AM

An Open Letter to Sarah Palin

pickup · 07-10-2009, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tieguy

Looking our last three presidents and the options in congress it may be time for a president with a great rack and a nice set of legs.

you know tie. I am deeply disappointed in you. What would Sarah Palin think of you judging her for her rack and great legs? Do you think she would approve? I don't know, let's see how a young sarah heath(before marrying a palin) reacted when being judged for her body.

YouTube - SARAH PALIN SWIMSUIT COMPETITION!! Miss Alaska Pageant 1984 ...

rod · 07-10-2009, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pickup

you know tie. I am deeply disappointed in you. What would Sarah Palin think of you judging her for her rack and great legs? Do you think she would approve? I don't know, let's see how a young sarah heath(before marrying a palin) reacted when being judged for her body.

YouTube - SARAH PALIN SWIMSUIT COMPETITION!! Miss Alaska Pageant 1984 ...

I can hear the chants now-------4 more years!- 4 more years!

rod · 07-10-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moreluck

Tie & Rod,

With your requirements, Kim Kardashian could be president ! Or better yet, Kendra!! Go Kendra, go Kendra !!

Kendra and the Kardashians are a little too dumb. ( although, as the old saying goes, "I wouldn't kick them out of bed for eating crackers"

P. S. --- I do believe Kendra would come off as being more intelligent than "W" did.

pickup · 07-10-2009, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rod

I can hear the chants now-------4 more years!- 4 more years!

I can hear the chants now- take it all off, take it all off!

tieguy · 07-10-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pickup

you know tie. I am deeply disappointed in you. What would Sarah Palin think of you judging her for her rack and great legs? Do you think she would approve? I don't know, let's see how a young sarah heath(before marrying a palin) reacted when being judged for her body.

YouTube - SARAH PALIN SWIMSUIT COMPETITION!! Miss Alaska Pageant 1984 ...

Thanks Pickup . I never realized she was so qualified for the presidency.