What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.|Ralph Waldo Emerson
| What is considered a "small"This is a discussion on What is considered a "small" within the UPS Discussions forums, part of the Brown Cafe UPS Forum category; "What is a small"
Ask your girlfriend...  | |
08-23-2007, 07:21 PM
|
#26 | | just a member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
Rep Power: 838 | Re: What is considered a "small" "What is a small"
Ask your girlfriend
__________________ There is no reality, only perception. |
| |
08-23-2007, 07:22 PM
|
#27 | | 22 year driver
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Midwest
Posts: 719
Rep Power: 5626 | Re: What is considered a "small" That's brutal Dino-funny, but brutal!!
__________________ Damn, I'm tired!! |
| |
08-24-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Rep Power: 750 | Re: What is considered a "small" A small is... anything smaller than 1 girth unit.
(see thread... publics view of dim weight)
__________________ No one quits. BUT we will fire your ass for any reason whatsoever. |
| |
08-24-2007, 05:16 PM
|
#29 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 113 | Re: What is considered a "small" Thanks for the welcome. I like to think if the communication was better, some decisions might be better understood, if not always agreed with. And yea, if we could bag refrigerators and save handles without killing anyone  , we would! |
| |
08-25-2007, 09:44 PM
|
#30 | | Moderator
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 2,437
Rep Power: 9800 | Re: What is considered a "small" Quote:
Originally Posted by dudebro Thanks for the welcome. I like to think if the communication was better, some decisions might be better understood, if not always agreed with. And yea, if we could bag refrigerators and save handles without killing anyone  , we would! | dudebro, Welcome to the Brown Cafe. I'm actually glad you registered and admitted your in IE, I hope you have a thick skin. You have posted a few things already that I find interesting. I encourage you to hang tough and keep it up, IE and PT Supes get blamed for everything at UPS. |
| |
08-26-2007, 01:55 PM
|
#31 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 113 | Re: What is considered a "small" Quote:
Originally Posted by scratch IE and PT Supes get blamed for everything at UPS. | There's a good reason for that....
And don't worry about my skin. I started my career as a loader and then a P/T supervisor on the Meadowlands Midnight sort, so I've taken every kind of abuse from above and below. D*** ***** (our COO) told me I was the worst part time supervisor in the world while pounding his Mack Truck bulldog on his desk at the time. And he liked me. I had just taken over a PD with all CT center loads and no employees or load charts and my misload frequency on my first day was 1/63.
Thanks for the welcome and the warning
Last edited by DS; 02-18-2008 at 03:26 PM.
Reason: real name used
|
| |
02-18-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#32 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 | Re: What is considered a "small" Quote:
Originally Posted by westsideworma from UPSers.com To help you identify smalls, here are a few tips to keep in mind. Key Messages §A small is defined as a package with a maximum size of 16 inches by 16 inches by 7 inches, weighing less than eight pounds. That’s about the size of a computer’s central processing unit (CPU) and the weight of a gallon of milk. §Smalls typically can be handled with one hand. §Smalls can never contain hazardous materials. §It is everyone's responsibility to containerize smalls, starting with the drivers during pickups. Conclusion Remember, smalls are a big deal because they carry items that are important to our customers and are a large portion of our daily package volume. When smalls are handled properly, our efficiency is increased while damages and losses are decreased. 16x16x7??? that doesn't sound too small to me lol | Look at what I found on UPSers.com when I was trying to get information about smalls. They say smalls are the size of three pizza boxes! Size Matters—Smalls are Huge Smalls have grown up and are now bigger than you may realize. Many UPSers are unclear about what is now considered a small by UPS standards. Questions such as these are often asked: - Is it any package smaller than three stacked large pizza boxes?
- Is it any package weighing the same as a gallon of milk?
We define smalls as 16x16x7 inches or less and weighing eight pounds or less. This is a standardized definition used at all centers. Therefore the answer to all of these questions is yes—as long as both the size and the weight limits are not exceeded. Reusable network containers (RNC), sometimes referred to as smalls bags or forever bags, have the ability to hold packages as big as three large pizza boxes stacked on top of each other. |
| |
02-18-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#33 | | geek
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Florida
Posts: 338
Rep Power: 2812 | Re: What is considered a "small" 16 x 16 x 7? Will that even fit through a small sort bin? Smalls got progressively bigger due to the forever bags that UPS has been using for the last several years. They are waaay stronger than the old plastic bags.
With the automated small sorts (aka bullfrogs), you can't place oversized smalls on the trays, otherwise you get rejects, missorts, or a pile of packages at the end of the bullfrog.
Containerizing smalls has always been a good thing in my opinion. Too much stuff gets lost otherwise. |
| |
02-18-2008, 04:30 PM
|
#34 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 441
Rep Power: 1084 | Re: What is considered a "small" Anything easily tossed, that won't break |
| |
02-20-2008, 02:07 AM
|
#35 | | 555
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Texas, UPS Southern Conference
Posts: 1,692
Rep Power: 11484 | Re: What is considered a "small" Quote:
Originally Posted by brownmonster Hard to tote em if you can't find any totes. No I will not use forever bags, too hard to load. | Totes are not allowed in our building for smalls, they tip over too easily on the slides doing away with the principle of smalls containerizing.
__________________ The reason politicians try so hard to get re-elected is that they would hate to have to make a living under the laws they've passed. |
| |
02-20-2008, 09:56 PM
|
#36 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Sedona, Arizona - Proud to be in McCain Country
Posts: 1,131
Rep Power: 11424 | Re: What is considered a "small" Dudbro and Westside have the textbook answer. BUT another way to improve your performance numbers PPH and reduce the sort span is by increasing the smalls production. (BYPASS BAGS) The more smalls flowing through the small sort the less pkgs going through the sort isle. If you can cut 15 minutes off the sort and you have 60 loaders in the outbound you can cut 15 minutes per employee in the outbound...which would increase your PPH accordingly. These are some of the things an operator can do to reach the numbers that are said to be unrealistic. Most of the loaders I dealt with would rather get out of the hub earlier and handle less pieces.
Another fix to improving the small sort to get the numbers is to put in a secondary sort which breaks down the small sort read which becomes easier to learn and staff.
Your staff comes from the load side and you move those folks back and forth as needed. You also train some unloaders to go to the small sort as soon as they are ramping down in the unload. This stuff all works. You just got to implement it.
By talking with your people.... you found out who wants the work and who wants to go home (of course everything is by seniority). But you get your folks backing doing it this way. |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |