Brown Cafe

Go Back   Brown Cafe > Brown Cafe UPS Forum > UPS Discussions

» UPSer Mega Search

» Who's Chatting!
Members In Chat: 1
Join the Chat!

Please don't lie to me, unless you're absolutely sure I'll never find out the truth.|Ashleigh Brilliant

amazon has gone BASIC!!!

This is a discussion on amazon has gone BASIC!!! within the UPS Discussions forums, part of the Brown Cafe UPS Forum category; had a amazon.com basic package today. I had to do a double take as this is the first time I ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2004, 09:09 PM   #1
ironylife
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

had a amazon.com basic package today. I had to do a double take as this is the first time I had seen one. Looks like its from the same city as the Target wharehouse which has a business on amazon.com. Has anyone noticed the air that were getting from amazon this year. Last year I saw lots of fedex air on doorsteps, but this year have not seen any for them, just a few usps and everything else UPS. This is a good thing for ups since amazon has been blowing up with volume.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 03:58 AM   #2
speeddemon
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I just fear its going to hinder the hiring of more full time drivers. Glad Im already there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 06:07 AM   #3
worldwide
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"I just fear its going to hinder the hiring of more full time drivers."

How is more volume going to hinder the hiring of more drivers? More drivers are needed to deliver this new additional volume that was previously sent via the USPS. Remember-Basic packages are picked up, sorted and delivered by UPS employees.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 06:13 AM   #4
wkmac
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You know Basic is a double edged sword. On the one hand it is a tool used to navigate around the union UPSers but on the otherhand it is a tool used to compete against FDX, DHL, etc. It is a service that bears watching but it is also a service that maybe in the bigger picture we should grant some cautious acceptance. I say that in light that any volume taken from FDX, DHL, etc. is taking money, in the case of FDX, directly away from a non-union competitor or another competitor who could grow stronger and become an even greater threat.

In a perfect world FDX goes away and UPS and DHL divy up the pie. The reason I say that is DHL (old Airborne) is Teamster and the influx of volume would fatten the stock price and make the Glenlake folks happy and the volume would create job growth at UPS and DHL in the union ranks thus helping the various pension plans out there with a huge influx of fresh dollars to waste! Sorry, had to get my one dig in but you get the obvious point I'm sure.

It's true Basic could directly effect union job growth within the company but if the competitor gets a free shot at getting stronger then it's possible instead of just looking at stagnate job growth at UPS we could see minor or even major job loss with many of us here being it's victims. I won't disagree with much of what the naysayers are suggesting about Basic but in light of the real world out there it may be a risk we have to take and accept.

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't FDX have Amazon? If true then I'm glad we got it even if it is under Basic. Even with Basic at some point in the process a union UPSer has a job to do with it. With FDX, that's truly not the case at all. JMO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 06:35 AM   #5
wkmac
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

worldwide,
You're right in some degree but I think what concerns many is that a center has 500 Basic packages for example, one driver delivers them to the USPS for that final process to the customer. If those 500 packages were UPS ground or other standard UPS service then those 500 packages would likely be split out amongst many drivers instead of the one. From the driver standpoint I can appreciate and understand the concern they have about this service.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 07:24 AM   #6
spidey
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In the case of the Basics (all new volume), the drivers to whom those pkgs would have been divied up to would be wearing clown suits or spiffy green golf shirts. I'd rather have one driver in tattered brown deliver 500 than 50 competing drivers delivering 10 each. This saves our customer money, too...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 07:48 AM   #7
tieguy
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can tell you that we get a lot less of the amazon smalls in todays world. Most of this has been going post office. If we could get this volume back with our basic service that would be huge. I have seen amazon trailers with as many as 10,000 packages in them. Where did you see that package coming from. The target.com shipping and regular amazon location I know of are in Delaware. Is that what your showing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 08:18 AM   #8
johnny
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aren't the basic packages that go to the USPS only for rural delivery areas?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 11:05 AM   #9
johnkyblue
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We have an amazon hub that does target here too. Most of the really small packages went to the post office, but we still do a lot of them.

They put at least 5 trailer full loads here a day, and as many as 40. I believe that many of their loads are sent elsewhere too.

I haven't seen a basic box yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 11:05 AM   #10
ok2bclever
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wkmac,

Small correction, DHL is not Teamster.

Airborne was Teamster in some locations and not in most.

As a foreign company taking over an American one for the purposes of appearing legally to be American to compete over here they are trying not to make waves and accepted the status quo at those locations where Airborne is Teamster.

I would say that the Teamsters as a national organization need to go after the entire DHL/former Airborne chain immediately while DHL is "contentious publicity" shy and try to convert the entire US section of the company into a unionized company to both benefit the Teamsters, the various Teamster pension funds and UPS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 11:15 AM   #11
wkmac
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok2bc,
I know DHL in total is not Teamster and thus my "old Airborne" footnote. Was not aware of status of old Airborne nationwide being Teamster I just knew in our local area all Airborne that became DHL is Teamster.

Good point about going after DHL in total by the IBT. I'm assuming Airborne was under the NLRA and therefore easier to organize site to site but what is DHL under? Are they another FDX with the Railway Act protections? You know we probably use the rail 10 times more than FDX but they reap the protection of the railway act. Go Figure (said with a chuckle!)

You guys in the areas where old Airborne wasn't union need to hound your local leadership about organizing efforts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 01:17 PM   #12
wily_old_vet
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

irony-are you sure it was a BASIC package. There is a new service in some of the software people are using called Shipper Release (in Worldship after Jan 1st I believe). You get the same screen when you scan it as you do BASIC about releasing the pkg without signature. A BASIC pkg will say BASIC just above the barcode. I delivered quite a few Target pkgs this Christmas that were shipper release.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 02:50 PM   #13
upsdude
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I delivered an Internet package today that was “Shipper Release”. Being a guy with several apartment complexes, I’m all for “Shipper Release”.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 04:02 PM   #14
worldwide
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wkmac posted "You're right in some degree but I think what concerns many is that a center has 500 Basic packages for example, one driver delivers them to the USPS for that final process to the customer. If those 500 packages were UPS ground or other standard UPS service then those 500 packages would likely be split out amongst many drivers instead of the one. From the driver standpoint I can appreciate and understand the concern they have about this service."

I have to disagree with you. First, one driver will not deliver all the packages-they will be spread throughout the center. If 500 Basic packages come in to a center, they will all be delivered by several different UPS Teamster drivers. Those 500 packages were not in the UPS system before and were most likely with the USPS and not Fedex.

The majority of the Basic packages will be delivered to the final consignee by a UPS driver. A small percetage will be delivered to a post office in a rural or super-rural area by a UPS driver. Again-all deliveries are being made by UPS to the final customer. IN some cases the post office is the customer.

Think about which routes are most likely to be cut back and are NOT expanding--the rural routes due to high UPS residential rates compared to USPS rates. Some customers do not want to pay for all the "bells and whistles" of UPS Ground--they want a "basic" service. So, Basic service is actually sending more packages to the routes that are most likely to be cut back-the rural routes.

Basic is a win all around for UPS. UPS wins new volume from the USPS. ALL Basic packages are picked up, sorted and delivered by a Teamster, and the more volume in the system, the more (Teamster) employees that are needed to pickup, sort and deliver the packages.

Remember both Fedex and DHL have similar workshare programs that allow them to deliver packages to the USPS. The difference is that ALL of the packages are delivered to the USPS for delivery-neither DHL nor Fedex deliver the packages. Basic has an advantage over them becausse they are fully tracked in the UPS system and the majority are delivered by a UPS driver to the final consignee.

It's amazing how the Teamsters want to fight over new volume in the system and new jobs. Just look at the LTL industry to see what effect restrictive work rules have had, in part, in that industry. There are countless LTL companies that employed thousands of Teamsters that are out of business. Do the Teasters want to commit a slower demise at UPS as well?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2004, 04:48 PM   #15
sweatyguy
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Then again, in my center/neck of the woods we just deliver all of our basic packages...So whether we get 10 or 1000, its new volume here for us...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 12:41 PM   #16
brownmonster
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One thing I noticed with the Chadwicks Basic pkgs is all the ARS returns we are seeing. That is also new volume. The DHL guys are being organized by the Teamsters in diff. areas. They are separate companies that contract to do deliveries for DHL, so unionizing the nationwide workforce at once is not possible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 04:45 PM   #17
ironylife
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You guys.... this was a basic package. I have a center that has seen lots of basic packages, from checks direct, chadwicks, etc, and I can tell you that 90% of these packages are being delivered to the customer by us, not the post office. I know there are some of you guys that work in rural and super rural areas so you might be delivering stuff to the post office, but what ive seen in my center has been VERY positive. And one more thing, I have seen many packages from basic customers that have been 10 lb ground and also 2da and nda, so this is just bonus money for ups. It sucks to be in a small center and see that stuff go to mr postman, but there are drivers being hired on at larger centers, one of the reasons being volume growth from basic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 05:01 PM   #18
ironylife
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Anyone get the ups teamster magazine from the ibt. it has an article on trying to organize fedex ground, and dhl contractors. One quick thing about amazon. I get lots of amazon still. I ordered two personal items from them and they both came from ups. Does anyone remember when we use to get cd's from amazon, those things use to get cracked all the time, so on that stuff its probably better off with the post office, all I know is that most of the parcels still come by ups.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005, 05:26 AM   #19
over9five
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Im waiting for a cable I ordered from Amazon. its coming Fedex ground. Was out for delivery Wednesday, but ended up "delayed by area weather". Bold faced lie, no weather here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 08:23 AM   #20
tieguy
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Does anyone remember when we use to get cd's from amazon,"

We actually saw some of the CD merchandise this year for the first time in a long time. When they first came out with the CD the packaging was an absolute nightmare for us.I hope they have gotten better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 11:06 AM   #21
ironylife
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

remember the packaging tie...it was specially made for 1 or 2 cds and the back of it was open. Sometines the flap came undone causing the cd to fall out and other times it got cracked. I ordered a shortwave radio and a book from them and that stuff was surrounded with those air pillows, so I know they do wrap some stuff properly...but those damn cds are a different story
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:27 PM   #22
bwatts
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What I don't understand is that when I am delivering my basics to our post office the FDX AIR driver shows up to deliver some too. I mean really, why overnight it? It still takes the postal service another 4-6 days to deliver it.

On a lighter note... how many blue bag bar codes do you have to manually type in due to smearing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 08:08 AM   #23
wily_old_vet
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BWatts-A bunch. I still haven't seen any BASIC from Amazon but did have a couple of Checks Direct today.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 11:18 AM   #24
wornoutupser
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have a question for the BASIC packages going to the USPS.
What is the weight limit? I have seen 4 and 5 pound pkgs this week going to the PO.
I thought the limit was 2 pounds. Am I wrong?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 01:06 PM   #25
browndude
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes the weight limit for a basic pkg is 5 pounds
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
amazon, basic

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
basic packages? rebel UPS Discussions 20 05-21-2007 06:33 PM
new basic accounts coldworld UPS Discussions 2 03-18-2006 10:53 PM
Basic Service UPSBOI UPS Discussions 8 01-12-2006 11:35 PM
New BASIC Account wily_old_vet The Archives 1 08-14-2004 02:54 PM
UPS BASIC loyalmbe The Archives 50 12-13-2003 06:24 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Contents Copyright© 1999 - 2008 Style and Design LLC - This website is not sponsored or endorsed by UPS, FedEx or the Teamsters Union.
Content on Brown Cafe forums may not be duplicated without permission.