Never doubt that a small, group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.|Margaret Mead
| Fixing trace problems in EDDThis is a discussion on Fixing trace problems in EDD within the UPS Discussions forums, part of the Brown Cafe UPS Forum category; Originally Posted by stevetheupsguy
Very true, why do so many stops have the same pal number. I have whole strip ...  | |
10-02-2008, 07:30 PM
|
#26 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by stevetheupsguy Very true, why do so many stops have the same pal number. I have whole strip malls with the same pal number. | If the address is one that has a drop down menu on your diad, then PAS will usually sort the stops. Like Tuesday I had a mall at 800 E Dimond Blvd, but that address was in my EDD 30 odd times, one for each "stop" plus one for all the packages that didn't fit any of the consignee names stored in they system. So Best Buy will be RDC but Footlocker will be on shelf 7, etc.
Problem is if the data is not in the system then PAS treats as one big bulk stop. |
| |
10-02-2008, 07:44 PM
|
#27 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 362
Rep Power: 4598 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by AKCoverMan
Problem is if the data is not in the system then PAS treats as one big bulk stop. | We have a fix to this problem in my area. But as usual fix one problem, here's another. Our system is set up to where if something is not in the system, you cant simply Pal it to one big catch all. A pkg not in the system is sent to a clerk area who then has to manually put in a consignee. This has completely eliminated the one bulk stop problem. Only problem we do have is when this clerk cant figure out exactly what to put. They either guess or put Mall Office. Even so, out of every 500 pkgs, maybe 3 or 4 get messed up.
__________________ "either you live by the word of God or you dont live by the word of God, and there's nothing in between. And in our secular permissive society, that's just a hateful idea." John Hagee |
| |
10-03-2008, 07:20 PM
|
#28 | | 30 years and counting
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: 3343 Stuart FL
Posts: 548
Rep Power: 1370 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by AKCoverMan If the address is one that has a drop down menu on your diad, then PAS will usually sort the stops. Like Tuesday I had a mall at 800 E Dimond Blvd, but that address was in my EDD 30 odd times, one for each "stop" plus one for all the packages that didn't fit any of the consignee names stored in they system. So Best Buy will be RDC but Footlocker will be on shelf 7, etc.
Problem is if the data is not in the system then PAS treats as one big bulk stop. | Quote:
Originally Posted by tourists24 We have a fix to this problem in my area. But as usual fix one problem, here's another. Our system is set up to where if something is not in the system, you cant simply Pal it to one big catch all. A pkg not in the system is sent to a clerk area who then has to manually put in a consignee. This has completely eliminated the one bulk stop problem. Only problem we do have is when this clerk cant figure out exactly what to put. They either guess or put Mall Office. Even so, out of every 500 pkgs, maybe 3 or 4 get messed up. |
I'm talking about all seperate addresses. I know what you guys mean. Our mall is 3174 NW federal Hwy. Bunches of packages come addressed to that same address, but that's the actual mall office address, LOL. My dilemma has to do with different addresses that are close, so EDD puts the same sequence number on like 5 different stops. They come up as seperate stops in my diad, but with all the same sequence numbers, my loader lumps them all together. This will really become a problem at peak. Any suggestions??? |
| |
10-03-2008, 11:53 PM
|
#29 | | 555
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Texas, UPS Southern Conference
Posts: 1,694
Rep Power: 11484 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by stevetheupsguy I'm talking about all seperate addresses. I know what you guys mean. Our mall is 3174 NW federal Hwy. Bunches of packages come addressed to that same address, but that's the actual mall office address, LOL. My dilemma has to do with different addresses that are close, so EDD puts the same sequence number on like 5 different stops. They come up as seperate stops in my diad, but with all the same sequence numbers, my loader lumps them all together. This will really become a problem at peak. Any suggestions??? | I don't know of a way to remedy that problem. All I can see is that you have to make sure you get all packages for a multi-package stop by.....looking for them. With most of our loaders if they get it in the right sequence he/she is a genius.
__________________ The reason politicians try so hard to get re-elected is that they would hate to have to make a living under the laws they've passed. |
| |
10-04-2008, 07:11 AM
|
#30 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,541
Rep Power: 16025 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by brownmonster I have the same situation and both are paled to the same sequence number. Things can be done to make this system better but half the people don't know how and the other half doesn't care. | We just went on this system and from I have read for years on here, it can be good or bad. I just think if we had a small meeting explaining to us what a pal label, for starters, etc , we could be more helpful in changing mistakes. I had one address palled with a 4000, and one palled with a 1000. I called it in but with no experience I dont know what the label had on it that made it do that. Also the stamper needs ink, the loaders cant see to load them quickly, and the drivers cant read them. The stamper guy told us the cartridges are too expensive and UPS doent want to spend the $$?? |
| |
10-04-2008, 07:22 AM
|
#31 | | Box Monkey
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 1,066
Rep Power: 5470 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by AKCoverMan As a cover driver I see trace problems on most of the routes I cover. The regular drivers are used to these hickups in the route and just deliver the stops in the order that makes sense rather than the route in EDD.
What process do you use in your center to get problems in EDD cleaned up? |
Ok, I tried to ignore this thread but I can't. As a cover driver you should not be fixing the regular drivers route. I know you're concerns but don't go pissing off the regular driver by making changes he is unaware of. Maybe you should go to him and mention changing some things and inform him that it would help him in the long run by eliminating any any problems with cover drivers in the future.
i used to have a guy that would cover my route that would change things in my EDD all the time. It really started to piss me off so I said something to him. He kept telling me how the route used to be run and that I was doing it wrong. Funny cause when i relooped it i actually cut time and miles off the route and have 90% of my commercial done before noon where as he would be running circles 3-4 times and passing the smae landmarks several times throughout the day. I gained more stops  , but at the sme time I can get more stops done more effeciently when you aren't on the same street 4 seperate times in 30 minutes.
Moral: don't mess with a route that's not yours. when you have your own route you can me Mr. Perfect.
__________________ Who needs family when you've got Brown? |
| |
10-04-2008, 08:18 AM
|
#32 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Below the Mason Dixon Line.
Posts: 1,820
Rep Power: 6191 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD I wouldn't worry about correcting problems on a route whether it's a bid route or not. The route doesn't belong to the bid driver. It belongs to all of because eventually others will have to run the route too. It's not like FedEx Ground where they have actually bought the routes and they really do belong to them. But again the problems I'd try to fix would be obvious and would probably be how the bid driver runs the route anyway. Such as dead end streets that are sequenced backwards in EDD. I wouldn't change something that doesn't need to be changed. And I'm definitely not going to shy away from correcting problems in EDD just because the bid driver has a chip on his/her shoulder and doesn't want things at UPS to work right. LOL! Nice attitude huh?
I fixed an entire neighborhood's trace on a bid route a while back and the bid driver sure was happy about it. I run that route at least three times each month and got sick of having to dig packages out of the loads to run that neighborhood logically so I fixed the problem. It was the first time I've been able to get our dispatch sup to fix a problem of that magnitude. All of my other past attempts were blown off. That is a problem we have here as well. I agree that when all else fails just run the routes at 100% trace and when it screws up management's "numbers" we'll see them act quickly. If each and every driver in a center would do this then management would have to fix trace issues.
__________________ "I noticed that everybody that is pro-abortion already has been born."
-Ronald Reagan. |
| |
10-04-2008, 08:33 AM
|
#33 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 622
Rep Power: 1356 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by trplnkl I don't know of a way to remedy that problem. All I can see is that you have to make sure you get all packages for a multi-package stop by.....looking for them. With most of our loaders if they get it in the right sequence he/she is a genius. |
This can be fixed by having that particular numerical address in EDD changed to NIS.
This will force all packages to this address to go for a lookup. This will be a major pain to your lookup clerks but it will fix the problem. |
| |
10-04-2008, 09:45 AM
|
#34 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,807
Rep Power: 18521 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by toonertoo We just went on this system and from I have read for years on here, it can be good or bad. I just think if we had a small meeting explaining to us what a pal label, for starters, etc , we could be more helpful in changing mistakes. I had one address palled with a 4000, and one palled with a 1000. I called it in but with no experience I dont know what the label had on it that made it do that. Also the stamper needs ink, the loaders cant see to load them quickly, and the drivers cant read them. The stamper guy told us the cartridges are too expensive and UPS doent want to spend the $$?? |
I would be willing to bet that the pkg PALed to the 4000 section was ground and the pkg PALed to the 1000 section was an air pkg. |
| |
10-04-2008, 10:16 AM
|
#35 | | Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,541
Rep Power: 16025 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateNYUPSer I would be willing to bet that the pkg PALed to the 4000 section was ground and the pkg PALed to the 1000 section was an air pkg. | No It was not, it said UPs ground and when I del it it did not show up late, which is what the guy said when I asked him about the problem. Then they told me about the ink problem which I was already told and it was without a doubt 1000. |
| |
10-04-2008, 10:25 AM
|
#36 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by Cementups Ok, I tried to ignore this thread but I can't. As a cover driver you should not be fixing the regular drivers route. I know you're concerns but don't go pissing off the regular driver by making changes he is unaware of. Maybe you should go to him and mention changing some things and inform him that it would help him in the long run by eliminating any any problems with cover drivers in the future.
i used to have a guy that would cover my route that would change things in my EDD all the time. It really started to piss me off so I said something to him. He kept telling me how the route used to be run and that I was doing it wrong. Funny cause when i relooped it i actually cut time and miles off the route and have 90% of my commercial done before noon where as he would be running circles 3-4 times and passing the smae landmarks several times throughout the day. I gained more stops  , but at the sme time I can get more stops done more effeciently when you aren't on the same street 4 seperate times in 30 minutes.
Moral: don't mess with a route that's not yours. when you have your own route you can me Mr. Perfect. | Again. I get that. I am NOT trying to change anyones route. I am trying to make EDD match the way the regular driver runs the route. We are not a large center, any of the things I want to change the regular route driver wants to change also. I would never suggest anything be changed without talking to the regular route driver first. But I am talking about stops that show up in sequence but can't be run that way becuase a street does not go thru etc. New streets that are not even in the DOL yet. (These stops come down the belt after PCM with PAL labels that say "NIS" Not in System and we scramble to figure out which car should take them, then have to remeber them during the day since they are not in EDD. Also I am talking about collecting data and setting up consignee records for multiple stop addresses. Some are built well, some have not been updated for years, and some have not been built at all. So when I cover the 01D route and get to the strip mall at 549 W International Airport Road I have to stop and dig all the packages out of FL4 and sort them out by stop. I am guessing there is zero allowed time for this, and I know that it means inaccurate stop counts in the morning. Some people have gotten to the stage that they just wont even bother to tell the center to fix these things; I would rather try to solve these issues than just sit around before PCM and bitch about it with other drivers. The problem is the regular drivers after a few months have learned where the problems are on the trace and simply skip around and do it in the order that makes sense. Then cover drivers come along and totally fall down on the route becuase they are trying to follow "trace". On a route I covered last week I literally drove be the same place five times following "trace" thru a couple of neighborhoods. I know thru conversations with the bid driver that he does not follow trace on this section, so I am not going to screw him up by trying to work with the center to fix EDD. BTW the bid driver is a remote start who only sees the inside of the center a few times a year. I just don't buy the idea that these problems should not be addressed simply becuase I don't "own" the route. I am pretty sure the logo on my uniform is the same as the bid drivers. I am not working against him/her. |
| |
10-04-2008, 10:29 AM
|
#37 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by big_arrow_up I wouldn't worry about correcting problems on a route whether it's a bid route or not. The route doesn't belong to the bid driver. It belongs to all of because eventually others will have to run the route too. It's not like FedEx Ground where they have actually bought the routes and they really do belong to them. But again the problems I'd try to fix would be obvious and would probably be how the bid driver runs the route anyway. Such as dead end streets that are sequenced backwards in EDD. I wouldn't change something that doesn't need to be changed. And I'm definitely not going to shy away from correcting problems in EDD just because the bid driver has a chip on his/her shoulder and doesn't want things at UPS to work right. LOL! Nice attitude huh?
I fixed an entire neighborhood's trace on a bid route a while back and the bid driver sure was happy about it. I run that route at least three times each month and got sick of having to dig packages out of the loads to run that neighborhood logically so I fixed the problem. It was the first time I've been able to get our dispatch sup to fix a problem of that magnitude. All of my other past attempts were blown off. That is a problem we have here as well. I agree that when all else fails just run the routes at 100% trace and when it screws up management's "numbers" we'll see them act quickly. If each and every driver in a center would do this then management would have to fix trace issues. | So how did you get it done? Just a sit down with the dispatch sup? |
| |
10-04-2008, 12:17 PM
|
#38 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,208
Rep Power: 9356 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Is it possible the regular driver keeps it that way so only he can be successful on that route and the cover's won't burn it up and make him look bad?
__________________ PAS All hype, no substance! |
| |
10-04-2008, 05:42 PM
|
#39 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Below the Mason Dixon Line.
Posts: 1,820
Rep Power: 6191 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by AKCoverMan So how did you get it done? Just a sit down with the dispatch sup? | Sort of. I jotted down some notes on each street in the neighborhood on a piece of paper and showed him what the route would look like on the map. He has pretty good area knowledge so it was easy to explain.
__________________ "I noticed that everybody that is pro-abortion already has been born."
-Ronald Reagan. |
| |
10-04-2008, 09:40 PM
|
#40 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,015
Rep Power: 4915 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by brownmonster Is it possible the regular driver keeps it that way so only he can be successful on that route and the cover's won't burn it up and make him look bad? |
That sounds a little dishonest to me.
__________________ LOOK SHARP DON'T GET CUT |
| |
10-05-2008, 03:01 AM
|
#41 | | retired and happy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,718
Rep Power: 9333 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989 That sounds a little dishonest to me. | No -- what is dishonest is some rookie skipping his lunch, driving like a bat outa hell and bringing back a truck load of send agains -----then having your sup or CM jump down your throat because so and so ran your route and was way under allowed.  Unfortunately UPS has created an environment where you HAVE to protect your own butt and if having your own little secrets to your route helps-then so be it. It's too bad but that is the way it is. |
| |
10-05-2008, 05:20 AM
|
#42 | | 555
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Texas, UPS Southern Conference
Posts: 1,694
Rep Power: 11484 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by rod No -- what is dishonest is some rookie skipping his lunch, driving like a bat outa hell and bringing back a truck load of send agains ----- then having your sup or CM jump down your throat because so and so ran your route and was way under allowed. Unfortunately UPS has created an environment where you HAVE to protect your own butt and if having your own little secrets to your route helps-then so be it. It's too bad but that is the way it is. | Do I look like "so in so"? I'm not "so in so" I can't and will not try to explain what he does or doesn't do on my route. When "so in so" has enough seniority he can bid my route. When UPS gives me a perfect load I will give them a fair days work. Oh wait, I do that every day. I'm with ya 100% on this one.
__________________ The reason politicians try so hard to get re-elected is that they would hate to have to make a living under the laws they've passed. |
| |
10-05-2008, 05:24 AM
|
#43 | | Upstate NY
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD In our building there is a big push to be 80%. We all know when we get to that number they will want 90%. You know where they want to be. When they first started this PAS(Piece A Sh#*) .I had it set up over 90%. Then they started messing with numbers now I run about 75. I redid a new DOL and somehow it disappeared. Now i just don't care. I will only do it when I get in at 7pm. So they can watch me get 40 an hr. I read slow. To me it is simple- a computer is about memory. It should set up a route on its own. Based on the week before-month before-year before. |
| |
10-05-2008, 06:04 AM
|
#44 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Below the Mason Dixon Line.
Posts: 1,820
Rep Power: 6191 | Re: Fixing trace problems in EDD Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 go In our building there is a big push to be 80%. We all know when we get to that number they will want 90%. You know where they want to be. When they first started this PAS(Piece A Sh#*) .I had it set up over 90%. Then they started messing with numbers now I run about 75. I redid a new DOL and somehow it disappeared. Now i just don't care. I will only do it when I get in at 7pm. So they can watch me get 40 an hr. I read slow. To me it is simple- a computer is about memory. It should set up a route on its own. Based on the week before-month before-year before. | Here they want 85% percent but you can have a 50% day as long as there is a negative number next to you name on the operation report. I think its funny how the "best drivers" all skip their lunches and then get a big smile of pride on their faces the next morning when they see the bonus they made on the report. Fools! LOL!
__________________ "I noticed that everybody that is pro-abortion already has been born."
-Ronald Reagan. |
| |
10-05-2008, 06:29 AM
|
# | |