Quote:
Originally Posted by worthlessdriver By always blaming the drivers for every accident does UPS open themselves up to more law suites? If you have an accident and a lawyer finds out that the mgt. said you (the driver) were at fault, could he use that fact against UPS in a suite.
Seems he could just get in front of a jury and tell them "Even UPS says he is guilty". I would think a good lawyer would have a slam dunk case. |
You folks are mixing apples and oranges. There is at fault according to the law and what the police write up. There is avoidable, this is what UPS deems weather the driver could have "avoided" the accident. I'll agree, we go overboard on what's avoidable and what's not. But we aren't saying the driver is at fault for the accident. We are saying by not following methods, the driver could have avoided being hit. We hold our drivers to a higher standard then the law, and when the employee is between our standards and the law, it's avoidable.
Again, all it really does is cost a safe driving award, and a few days off. Relatively speaking no big deal.