Brown Cafe - UPS info for UPSers

Go Back   Brown Cafe - UPS info for UPSers > Brown Cafe UPS Forum > UPS Discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2009, 09:48 AM   #1
Work right slow and safe
Senior Member
 
Work right slow and safe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 41
Work right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Key entries

I was just checking to see if anyone knows why UPS makes all loaders and baggers do 10 or more Key entries per night. One sup stated for production If we have to stop to input the 1z number insteed of scanning them this will slow everyone down. Does this help the hub with number for the amount of time they use per night ? Do the customers get a charge if we have to enter them so ups can make more money per night? So all you Supervisors and managers help me understand why we must do this every night or get a write up thanks for the help.
Work right slow and safe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:30 PM   #2
nightshiftscottie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: midwest
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
nightshiftscottie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Key entries

Not management or sup, but in small sort, we're required to key enter anything that won't scan. If we miss one on an audited bag, we get in trouble.
nightshiftscottie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:58 PM   #3
upsguy72
Senior Member
 
upsguy72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: western ma
Posts: 390
Rep Power: 596
upsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond reputeupsguy72 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

Quote:
Originally Posted by Work right slow and safe View Post
I was just checking to see if anyone knows why UPS makes all loaders and baggers do 10 or more Key entries per night. One sup stated for production If we have to stop to input the 1z number insteed of scanning them this will slow everyone down. Does this help the hub with number for the amount of time they use per night ? Do the customers get a charge if we have to enter them so ups can make more money per night? So all you Supervisors and managers help me understand why we must do this every night or get a write up thanks for the help.

It's easy you work for UPS, things don't necessarily make sence you just do them becasue you are instructed too.
__________________
YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID
upsguy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:10 PM   #4
Work right slow and safe
Senior Member
 
Work right slow and safe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 41
Work right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightshiftscottie View Post
Not management or sup, but in small sort, we're required to key enter anything that won't scan. If we miss one on an audited bag, we get in trouble.

I work in small sort also we have to scan 10 or more per night about 2 hrs in the night they will come by and tell us how many we have and how many more we need to get before the night is up. Thats what does not make any sence we must have 10 or more it will be a write up for me

So does any one have to do this even if the barcode is good ???
Work right slow and safe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:29 PM   #5
brownIEman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 283
Rep Power: 2460
brownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond reputebrownIEman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

Quote:
Originally Posted by Work right slow and safe View Post
I was just checking to see if anyone knows why UPS makes all loaders and baggers do 10 or more Key entries per night. One sup stated for production If we have to stop to input the 1z number insteed of scanning them this will slow everyone down. Does this help the hub with number for the amount of time they use per night ? Do the customers get a charge if we have to enter them so ups can make more money per night? So all you Supervisors and managers help me understand why we must do this every night or get a write up thanks for the help.
The only justification I can conceive for something like this is if they are having a lot of missed intermediate scans being reported. They might be making the assumption that people are just tossing packages with bar codes that won't scan into a bag or feeder unscanned so they do not have to bother with them. Since it is very difficult to catch someone doing this without standing over them all night, they may be making the rule of thumb that you are likely to get at least 10 key necessary bar codes a night, so they want to see them. It would also get people into the habit of keying the bar codes, so they would be less likely to avoid it, and also faster at it when they need to.

Often times, when you take a step back and look at the macro level of an operation, you notice stuff like this. Say I am comparing hub A in one state and hub B in another. I notice from reports I can pull, that hub A has a ton of missed intermediate scans in comparison to hub B. I also notice that Hub A has almost no keyed scan entries. I make a logical conclusion and figure people are not bothering with keying bar codes that won't scan. So say I get the appropriate level of mgmnt involved and force hub A to require 10 keyed bar codes per employee per night. The workers in the hub might get ticked, but low and behold, they start keying packages. The number of missed scans in Hub A goes way down.

This is a good example of the sort of thing that can look really silly and wasteful from the micro view of the front lines but winds up in the bigger picture doing what we all should want to do, provide better service to our customers.

Of course, this is just speculation on my part. It could also be caused by some Napoleonic little egoist manger with an axe to grind. That does happen too.
brownIEman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:18 PM   #6
Work right slow and safe
Senior Member
 
Work right slow and safe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 41
Work right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond reputeWork right slow and safe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

Quote:
Originally Posted by brownIEman View Post
The only justification I can conceive for something like this is if they are having a lot of missed intermediate scans being reported. They might be making the assumption that people are just tossing packages with bar codes that won't scan into a bag or feeder unscanned so they do not have to bother with them. Since it is very difficult to catch someone doing this without standing over them all night, they may be making the rule of thumb that you are likely to get at least 10 key necessary bar codes a night, so they want to see them. It would also get people into the habit of keying the bar codes, so they would be less likely to avoid it, and also faster at it when they need to.

Often times, when you take a step back and look at the macro level of an operation, you notice stuff like this. Say I am comparing hub A in one state and hub B in another. I notice from reports I can pull, that hub A has a ton of missed intermediate scans in comparison to hub B. I also notice that Hub A has almost no keyed scan entries. I make a logical conclusion and figure people are not bothering with keying bar codes that won't scan. So say I get the appropriate level of mgmnt involved and force hub A to require 10 keyed bar codes per employee per night. The workers in the hub might get ticked, but low and behold, they start keying packages. The number of missed scans in Hub A goes way down.

This is a good example of the sort of thing that can look really silly and wasteful from the micro view of the front lines but winds up in the bigger picture doing what we all should want to do, provide better service to our customers.

Of course, this is just speculation on my part. It could also be caused by some Napoleonic little egoist manger with an axe to grind. That does happen too.

Thanks, you make a very good point we do have alot of people that toss them back on the belt and not key enter them It always better to have someone that can look in from the outside of the box
Work right slow and safe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:26 PM   #7
browniehound
Senior Member
 
browniehound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,545
Rep Power: 15908
browniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond reputebrowniehound has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

Quote:
Originally Posted by brownIEman View Post
The only justification I can conceive for something like this is if they are having a lot of missed intermediate scans being reported. They might be making the assumption that people are just tossing packages with bar codes that won't scan into a bag or feeder unscanned so they do not have to bother with them. Since it is very difficult to catch someone doing this without standing over them all night, they may be making the rule of thumb that you are likely to get at least 10 key necessary bar codes a night, so they want to see them. It would also get people into the habit of keying the bar codes, so they would be less likely to avoid it, and also faster at it when they need to.

Often times, when you take a step back and look at the macro level of an operation, you notice stuff like this. Say I am comparing hub A in one state and hub B in another. I notice from reports I can pull, that hub A has a ton of missed intermediate scans in comparison to hub B. I also notice that Hub A has almost no keyed scan entries. I make a logical conclusion and figure people are not bothering with keying bar codes that won't scan. So say I get the appropriate level of mgmnt involved and force hub A to require 10 keyed bar codes per employee per night. The workers in the hub might get ticked, but low and behold, they start keying packages. The number of missed scans in Hub A goes way down.

This is a good example of the sort of thing that can look really silly and wasteful from the micro view of the front lines but winds up in the bigger picture doing what we all should want to do, provide better service to our customers.

Of course, this is just speculation on my part. It could also be caused by some Napoleonic little egoist manger with an axe to grind. That does happen too.

No, I think you are dead on 100% correct. I know nothing about the subject, but that is the most lucid, logical explanation I could ask for...
__________________
Funny how?
browniehound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 04:55 AM   #8
trplnkl
555
 
trplnkl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas, UPS Southern Conference
Posts: 4,593
Rep Power: 19897
trplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond reputetrplnkl has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

I would bet that 90% of the nonsensical duties we have to preform are based on BrnIE's theory. It's a non-quota quota. I relate it to police don't have a quota for speeding tickets, but if they don't issue at least 5 per day, they aren't doing their job.
__________________
Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
trplnkl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 01:07 AM   #9
SoyFish
Senior Member
 
SoyFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 168
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 145
SoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond reputeSoyFish has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Key entries

I'd guess it's so that all the packages get scanned & gets people in the habit of key entering the ones that won't scan.

10 really isn't a lot considering that easily 5 packages will come that won't scan anyways.
__________________
What Goes On In My Mind? (Yes, that can be clicked.)
SoyFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
entries, key

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


» UPSer Mega Search

» Who's Chatting!
Members In Chat: 1
browndevil
Join the Chat!
» Current Poll
Is The White House War On Fox News Acceptable?
Yes, Fox News is anti-Obama and deserves White House retaliation. - 20.00%
25 Votes
No, Fox News deserves to be treated as any other news station. - 28.80%
36 Votes
This should be below the White House. - 14.40%
18 Votes
The White House is attacking "Freedom of the Press". - 23.20%
29 Votes
Doesn't the White House have more important issues (War, Economy, Obama Deficit)? - 36.80%
46 Votes
Total Votes: 125
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Contents Copyright © 1999 - 2009 Style and Design LLC - This website is not sponsored or endorsed by UPS, FedEx or the Teamsters Union.
Content on Brown Cafe forums may not be duplicated without permission.
no new posts