Brown Cafe - UPS info for UPSers

Go Back   Brown Cafe - UPS info for UPSers > Brown Cafe UPS Forum > UPS Labor Relations

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-24-2009, 12:59 PM   #1
chance
Junior Member
 
chance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
chance is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Pension requirements

Has anyone in the Western conference heard if they are thinking of changing retirement requirements ( 80 and out, golden 25, etc...). hoping these are rumors ( and hope not to start any by starting this thread). Thanx....
chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 02:52 PM   #2
brownrodster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,206
Rep Power: 1727
brownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond reputebrownrodster has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Haven't heard much of anything about our pension fund.


A couple years ago we were fully funded with 34 billion in the fund.

I would like to know how much we have in the fund now.
brownrodster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 07:49 PM   #3
Hangingon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Md
Posts: 353
Rep Power: 707
Hangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond reputeHangingon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Our local is announcing changes in retirement next month. We just voted for officers and they wanted to wait until after the vote before revealing the changes. Plenty of doomsday rumors floating around and we have had quite a few senior Feeder drivers decide to retire.
Local 639
Hangingon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:30 PM   #4
helenofcalifornia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,921
Rep Power: 10009
helenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond reputehelenofcalifornia has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

I believe that the last I read from the Western Conference was that our pension was now only funded to the tune of 84%. The recent economy downturn took quite a toll on it.
helenofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:32 PM   #5
Hoaxster
ModSta in Training
 
Hoaxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta - Innoplex
Posts: 4,458
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 9523
Hoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond reputeHoaxster has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Quote:
Originally Posted by helenofcalifornia View Post
I believe that the last I read from the Western Conference was that our pension was now only funded to the tune of 84%. The recent economy downturn took quite a toll on it.
No one heard the bells.
__________________
Pay no attention to what people say...observe their actions and above all else remember, "It is what it is".
Its a fascinating story, but as the Ferangi say, "A good lie is easier to believe than the truth."
Hoaxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:13 PM   #6
soberups
Bitingthe Hand that Feeds
 
soberups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oregon, Hillsboro center
Posts: 2,171
Rep Power: 27414
soberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Quote:
Originally Posted by helenofcalifornia View Post
I believe that the last I read from the Western Conference was that our pension was now only funded to the tune of 84%. The recent economy downturn took quite a toll on it.
It is still one of the best performing plans in the country.

When the market tanked, the board of trustees cut the accrual rate in order to keep the plan in "healthy" status required by the new pension law to avoid government intervention.

We "bought" PEER 80 so they cannot take it away from anyone who is already vested.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
soberups is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 06:23 AM   #7
Cezanne
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 253
Cezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond reputeCezanne has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Study ERISA law and know your vesting rights, from my limited understanding there are only certain requirements that any trustee can change relating to your pension benefits. They can change the formula of your future pension benefits, case in point the Central States debacle. They cannot change your previous vested time or your previous monetary benefit.

They can raise your retirement age requirements, for example from age 55 to age 62 to collect an early retirement package. By law all pension plans are set up to be collected at the standard age of 65, including the current social security system. There seems to be a shift going on for pension plans to save money on covering medical for retirees by raising the age for early retirement. Medicad or Medicare insurance takes over when you become eligible for social security usually at age 65.

Your current vested time is protected, no one can take that away. Against federal law, if that means anything anymore.

If you are concerned to any changes going on with your pension benefit, go to the HR department or write you pension plan trustees and ask for an estimate and the current SPD for that plan, keep it in a very protected place for any possible future use.

Again, look at Article 34 master on the monetary funding of your pension plan. The Western Conference plan is a monetary contribution plan therefore money is being put away per individual into your trusts. Most of the monetary contributions with this current contract are going into the pension and or health and welfare plans. I could be wrong on this but I believe that by the last year of this contract that over 500 dollars a week per individual will be going into your plan. That is alot of money.

Your vesting ratio of 84 percent is far above any current Teamster's run plan.

The real solution to any current pension underfunding especially with the Union run plans to to get more members to support the flood of baby boomers who will be eligible for retirement in the next 10 or 15 years. That is why our Union better get it's act together and start to get more appealing for workers to want to be members of a collective bargaining unit.

Bottom line get rid of the dumb politics and stupid me first attitutes of some of the leadership in all areas, Local, Joint Councils and International. Start prettying up to take advantage of the possible labor laws that might be coming down the pike to help all us members.

Off my soapbox...for now....

Last edited by Cezanne; 10-25-2009 at 06:30 AM. Reason: spelling
Cezanne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 09:00 AM   #8
1989
Senior Member
 
1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,661
Rep Power: 5462
1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute1989 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Quote:
Originally Posted by soberups View Post
It is still one of the best performing plans in the country.

When the market tanked, the board of trustees cut the accrual rate in order to keep the plan in "healthy" status required by the new pension law to avoid government intervention.

We "bought" PEER 80 so they cannot take it away from anyone who is already vested.
Don't we buy "peer 80" every month? So they can't take that away from past vested contributions. But they may be able to take away "peer 80" from future contributions.
__________________
LOOK SHARP DON'T GET CUT
1989 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 04:02 PM   #9
soberups
Bitingthe Hand that Feeds
 
soberups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oregon, Hillsboro center
Posts: 2,171
Rep Power: 27414
soberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond reputesoberups has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pension requirements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989 View Post
Don't we buy "peer 80" every month? So they can't take that away from past vested contributions. But they may be able to take away "peer 80" from future contributions.
We "bought it" by having an additional portion of our hourly wage diverted to the pension fund, I believe this occured something like 20 yrs ago. In order to "take away" PEER 80 they would have to stop contributing this additional amount, and even then it would only apply to anyone hired after that occured.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
soberups is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
pension, requirements

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Driver Requirements haydendavid380 UPS Discussions 9 02-25-2009 08:51 AM
Off the street supervisor requirements? xDELETEDx UPS Discussions 8 11-07-2007 09:31 AM
Essential Job Requirements Dee Tomsik UPS Discussions 2 10-23-2006 02:04 PM
Promotions to Supervisor – changing requirements Brown Assassin UPS Discussions 19 09-10-2006 02:24 PM

» UPSer Mega Search

» Who's Chatting!
Members In Chat: 1
browndevil
Join the Chat!
» Current Poll
Is The White House War On Fox News Acceptable?
Yes, Fox News is anti-Obama and deserves White House retaliation. - 20.00%
25 Votes
No, Fox News deserves to be treated as any other news station. - 28.80%
36 Votes
This should be below the White House. - 14.40%
18 Votes
The White House is attacking "Freedom of the Press". - 23.20%
29 Votes
Doesn't the White House have more important issues (War, Economy, Obama Deficit)? - 36.80%
46 Votes
Total Votes: 125
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Contents Copyright © 1999 - 2009 Style and Design LLC - This website is not sponsored or endorsed by UPS, FedEx or the Teamsters Union.
Content on Brown Cafe forums may not be duplicated without permission.
no new posts