Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 5260455" data-attributes="member: 48469"><p>This guy gets it. One can be pro-choice but also admit that there aren't constitutional grounds to uphold Roe. No need to listen. Just glad there are still thinkers in academia who are willing to admit they're thinkers. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.honestlypod.com/podcast/episode/1f97a8ba/the-yale-law-professor-who-is-anti-roe-but-pro-choice[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week.</p><p></p><p>What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to <em>overturn </em>Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Box Ox, post: 5260455, member: 48469"] This guy gets it. One can be pro-choice but also admit that there aren't constitutional grounds to uphold Roe. No need to listen. Just glad there are still thinkers in academia who are willing to admit they're thinkers. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.honestlypod.com/podcast/episode/1f97a8ba/the-yale-law-professor-who-is-anti-roe-but-pro-choice[/URL] "Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week. What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to [I]overturn [/I]Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.
Top