Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 5309422" data-attributes="member: 22662">I’ll accept that you, Thomas and the others are playing in the outskirts of precedent.  In their confirmation hearings they all referred to Roe as standing precedent and their respect for that standing precedent.  Nobody ever said anything about the precedent before Roe taking precedent over Roe.  That’s apparently where we are headed.That’s a fairly disingenuous application of precedent.  But that should be expected from a Republican Party that calls itself “conservative”.</blockquote>