Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5309676" data-attributes="member: 58386">And in keeping with that pay attention to the 3 specific rulings Judge Thomas went on record wanting to reconsider.Griswold: The right of married couple to purchase birth control.Lawrence: The ruling that bars states from criminalizing consensual sex.Obergefell: Gay marriage.Notice something here? All three pertain to human sexuality and sexual activity. His demand that they be brought back and ruled on again is a clear attack on youth and their very natural sexual prowess. An attack launched by a self righteous old judge who will soon be 75. Now when was the last time this old geezer went down on his fat old lady or had a nonmedically assisted hard on? And in what way was his conduct during that particular stage of his life any different, any more moral or any more beneficial to the nation&nbsp;&nbsp; than that which is practiced by American youth today? So what do we have here? A qualified SCOTUS jurist? Or just another wretched old man deeply envious of those whose youth, physical beauty and sexual vitality ageing has not yet rob them of who has decided to use the power of his position to get even with them?.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5309676, member: 58386"] And in keeping with that pay attention to the 3 specific rulings Judge Thomas went on record wanting to reconsider. Griswold: The right of married couple to purchase birth control. Lawrence: The ruling that bars states from criminalizing consensual sex. Obergefell: Gay marriage. Notice something here? All three pertain to human sexuality and sexual activity. His demand that they be brought back and ruled on again is a clear attack on youth and their very natural sexual prowess. An attack launched by a self righteous old judge who will soon be 75. Now when was the last time this old geezer went down on his fat old lady or had a nonmedically assisted hard on? And in what way was his conduct during that particular stage of his life any different, any more moral or any more beneficial to the nation than that which is practiced by American youth today? So what do we have here? A qualified SCOTUS jurist? Or just another wretched old man deeply envious of those whose youth, physical beauty and sexual vitality ageing has not yet rob them of who has decided to use the power of his position to get even with them?. [/QUOTE]

Verification