Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5312303" data-attributes="member: 58386">Is this your next laughably ridiculous claim? Forty nine year old Roe v Wade NOT finished law? If&nbsp;R v W is not an established legal precedent and finished law then exactly which prior rulings are and are NOT finished law?You&#039;re trying to do something akin to Tex. He tries&nbsp; all the time to try and cherry pick social program legislation. There&#039;s no bigger supporter of the social programs that benefit him than old Tex. While at the same time there&#039;s no louder critic of those programs that don&#039;t benefit him than Tex. Now 50 years ago this nation was 80% white and Christian. Today, that number is less than 50% and the overturning of Roe is not likely to impact those numbers in a way that favors whites. This nation&#039;s birthrate is the lowest since 1930 . No SCOTUS is going to have much of an impact on those numbers. Today&#039;s American woman is keenly aware of the fact that she has nobody to count on but herself and will continue to place her own self preservation at the top of her agenda and you cannot blame her. States should follow Ohio&#039;s example. Get the resources in place NOW if in the event that there is an upward surge in the number of unwanted babies. Ohio isn&#039;t buying the thumpers and lifers nonsense about them all being adopted. The numbers say otherwise. Full responsibility for creating this mess lies with the thumpers and pro lifers and as the saying goes.....&quot;if you&#039;re not p[art of the solution...then you&#039;re part of the problem.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5312303, member: 58386"] Is this your next laughably ridiculous claim? Forty nine year old Roe v Wade NOT finished law? If R v W is not an established legal precedent and finished law then exactly which prior rulings are and are NOT finished law? You're trying to do something akin to Tex. He tries all the time to try and cherry pick social program legislation. There's no bigger supporter of the social programs that benefit him than old Tex. While at the same time there's no louder critic of those programs that don't benefit him than Tex. Now 50 years ago this nation was 80% white and Christian. Today, that number is less than 50% and the overturning of Roe is not likely to impact those numbers in a way that favors whites. This nation's birthrate is the lowest since 1930 . No SCOTUS is going to have much of an impact on those numbers. Today's American woman is keenly aware of the fact that she has nobody to count on but herself and will continue to place her own self preservation at the top of her agenda and you cannot blame her. States should follow Ohio's example. Get the resources in place NOW if in the event that there is an upward surge in the number of unwanted babies. Ohio isn't buying the thumpers and lifers nonsense about them all being adopted. The numbers say otherwise. Full responsibility for creating this mess lies with the thumpers and pro lifers and as the saying goes....."if you're not p[art of the solution...then you're part of the problem. [/QUOTE]

Verification