Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 5318325" data-attributes="member: 48469"><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-really-said-about-roe-v-wade/" target="_blank">What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade - The Washington Post</a></p><p></p><p>"Ginsburg’s other main problem with <em>Roe </em>was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection — she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. Ginsburg herself had <a href="https://time.com/5354490/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade/" target="_blank">worked on such a case</a> around the time <em>Roe </em>was decided, but it was ultimately dismissed as moot when the military changed the relevant policy. In nominating Ginsburg, President Bill Clinton called her thoughts on this matter a “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/06/20/a-look-at-rove-v-wade-v-ginsburg-history-lesson-for-the-judge/6a8b1b10-0089-4b17-aec4-a17fc8d4bcf4/?itid=lk_inline_manual_24" target="_blank">very provocative and impressive argument</a>.”</p><p></p><p>“<em>Roe</em> isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said in a 2013 event <a href="https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit" target="_blank">at the University of Chicago</a>. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice. … It wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”</p><p></p><p>Ginsburg united these criticisms as early as 1984, saying in a speech at the University of North Carolina that <em>Roe </em>“<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/06/20/a-look-at-rove-v-wade-v-ginsburg-history-lesson-for-the-judge/6a8b1b10-0089-4b17-aec4-a17fc8d4bcf4/?itid=lk_inline_manual_27" target="_blank">ventured too far in the change it ordered and presented an incomplete justification for its action</a>.”</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the conservatives simply gained the votes necessary to agree with Ginsburg that Roe was a very sloppy decision in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Box Ox, post: 5318325, member: 48469"] [URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-really-said-about-roe-v-wade/']What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade - The Washington Post[/URL] "Ginsburg’s other main problem with [I]Roe [/I]was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection — she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. Ginsburg herself had [URL='https://time.com/5354490/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade/']worked on such a case[/URL] around the time [I]Roe [/I]was decided, but it was ultimately dismissed as moot when the military changed the relevant policy. In nominating Ginsburg, President Bill Clinton called her thoughts on this matter a “[URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/06/20/a-look-at-rove-v-wade-v-ginsburg-history-lesson-for-the-judge/6a8b1b10-0089-4b17-aec4-a17fc8d4bcf4/?itid=lk_inline_manual_24']very provocative and impressive argument[/URL].” “[I]Roe[/I] isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said in a 2013 event [URL='https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit']at the University of Chicago[/URL]. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice. … It wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.” Ginsburg united these criticisms as early as 1984, saying in a speech at the University of North Carolina that [I]Roe [/I]“[URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/06/20/a-look-at-rove-v-wade-v-ginsburg-history-lesson-for-the-judge/6a8b1b10-0089-4b17-aec4-a17fc8d4bcf4/?itid=lk_inline_manual_27']ventured too far in the change it ordered and presented an incomplete justification for its action[/URL].” I think the conservatives simply gained the votes necessary to agree with Ginsburg that Roe was a very sloppy decision in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.
Top
