Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5318499" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>You&#039;re essentially saying that if the Supreme Court got it wrong the first time we&#039;ll just have to live with it forever.&nbsp; Funny how that works when it&#039;s a ruling you agree with.&nbsp; Just out of curiosity if a woman can terminate a fully formed child until right before birth then why not allow her to kill it after it&#039;s born?&nbsp; Bills are too much, can&#039;t afford childcare, can&#039;t feed it and the other older children too.&nbsp; Why not just take it to an euthanasia clinic and have it mercifully put down?&nbsp; Why stop there?&nbsp; Elderly Alzheimer&#039;s patient is being a burden on his family.&nbsp; Off he goes.&nbsp; Repeat offender is being a burden to society.&nbsp; Why feed him in prison?&nbsp; If we&#039;re going to slaughter tens of millions of babies we might as well start trimming the fat elsewhere.&nbsp; Lean and mean.&nbsp; Show those Europeans how it&#039;s done.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5318499, member: 24302"] You're essentially saying that if the Supreme Court got it wrong the first time we'll just have to live with it forever. Funny how that works when it's a ruling you agree with. Just out of curiosity if a woman can terminate a fully formed child until right before birth then why not allow her to kill it after it's born? Bills are too much, can't afford childcare, can't feed it and the other older children too. Why not just take it to an euthanasia clinic and have it mercifully put down? Why stop there? Elderly Alzheimer's patient is being a burden on his family. Off he goes. Repeat offender is being a burden to society. Why feed him in prison? If we're going to slaughter tens of millions of babies we might as well start trimming the fat elsewhere. Lean and mean. Show those Europeans how it's done. [/QUOTE]

Verification