Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 5749972" data-attributes="member: 58386">It would appear that you have never heard of the Hyde Amendment. If you had you would not have make this laughable comment.And BTW. Your comment only reaffirms what I said earlier. Pro lifers want all pregnancies carried to full term but continue to refuse to accept the fact that their demands will indeed cost them money. Often state constitutions requires the state to provide economic support for children born to low income families. In fact last year in an attempt to get ahead of the expected increased demands for child support services following the overturning of Roe vs Wade Ohio moved the first 230 million dollars of an anticipated 705 million dollars into it&#039;s child welfare support programs. That did not sit well with Ohio voters and perhaps it helped to tip the scales in favor of making abortion rights part of the state&#039;s constitution. Perhaps the unwillingness of the pro life groups to step up and publicly accept economic responsibility for those constitutionally mandated child welfare service costs is why abortion rights are now in the state constitution.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 5749972, member: 58386"] It would appear that you have never heard of the Hyde Amendment. If you had you would not have make this laughable comment. And BTW. Your comment only reaffirms what I said earlier. Pro lifers want all pregnancies carried to full term but continue to refuse to accept the fact that their demands will indeed cost them money. Often state constitutions requires the state to provide economic support for children born to low income families. In fact last year in an attempt to get ahead of the expected increased demands for child support services following the overturning of Roe vs Wade Ohio moved the first 230 million dollars of an anticipated 705 million dollars into it's child welfare support programs. That did not sit well with Ohio voters and perhaps it helped to tip the scales in favor of making abortion rights part of the state's constitution. Perhaps the unwillingness of the pro life groups to step up and publicly accept economic responsibility for those constitutionally mandated child welfare service costs is why abortion rights are now in the state constitution. [/QUOTE]

Verification