Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AKCoverMan" data-source="post: 4829346" data-attributes="member: 17867">Getting back to the OP.. on the dot 9.50 hours worked is not a violation if you read NMA Art 37 Sec 1(c) the third paragraph lays it out:“Drivers who choose to opt-in on the 9.5 list shall have the right to file a grievance if the Employer has continually worked a driver more than nine and one half (9.5) hours per day for any three (3) days in the workweek.”&nbsp; There has to be a line somewhere.&nbsp; 9.50 is toes on the line but it takes 9.51 or better to be over the line.But I love the analogy of the NDA at 1031. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" />To take it further, when management complains that one of a drivers three 9.5&nbsp; “strikes”&nbsp; during the week are just barely over 9.5 I remind them that a 9.5 driver is ideally looking for no overtime so the company is missing the mark by over 90 mins not just a few minutes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AKCoverMan, post: 4829346, member: 17867"] Getting back to the OP.. on the dot 9.50 hours worked is not a violation if you read NMA Art 37 Sec 1(c) the third paragraph lays it out: “Drivers who choose to opt-in on the 9.5 list shall have the right to file a grievance if the Employer has continually worked a driver [B]more than [/B]nine and one half (9.5) hours per day for any three (3) days in the workweek.” There has to be a line somewhere. 9.50 is toes on the line but it takes 9.51 or better to be over the line. But I love the analogy of the NDA at 1031. 🤣 To take it further, when management complains that one of a drivers three 9.5 “strikes” during the week are just barely over 9.5 I remind them that a 9.5 driver is ideally looking for no overtime so the company is missing the mark by over 90 mins not just a few minutes. [/QUOTE]

Verification