Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
125000 jobs lost in June...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 749724" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>If Hillary won the nomination, there is nothing that prevents her from naming Obama VP if he would accept the job. President Taft after leaving office became the Chief Justice of SCOTUS so who knows.</p><p> </p><p>I like the original idea in the Constitution that whoever finished 2nd in the Presidential election was automatically the VP. That really lends itself IMO to a division of power and a possible check on potential abuse of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_executive_theory" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">unitary executive</span> </a>because the VP could use the legislative branch in the Senate to block consolidation of power, or so the theory goes. Looking at McCain one has to question that thinking!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 749724, member: 2189"] If Hillary won the nomination, there is nothing that prevents her from naming Obama VP if he would accept the job. President Taft after leaving office became the Chief Justice of SCOTUS so who knows. I like the original idea in the Constitution that whoever finished 2nd in the Presidential election was automatically the VP. That really lends itself IMO to a division of power and a possible check on potential abuse of the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_executive_theory"][COLOR=red]unitary executive[/COLOR] [/URL]because the VP could use the legislative branch in the Senate to block consolidation of power, or so the theory goes. Looking at McCain one has to question that thinking! :happy-very: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
125000 jobs lost in June...
Top