Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
1997 Strike. Old heads only. On Topic.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 3630986" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>IDK whether the amount is enough, but you proposed the union wasn't doing anything. </p><p>You also posted the guaranteed Feeder jobs that are now being brokered or tendered to the RR for transit. </p><p>If the 22.4 scheme is approved those also will be FT jobs and bennies.</p><p>Any increase in funding is better than no increase.</p><p>PT is and in many cases has been under the single employer UPS plan. Their rules re: funding are different.</p><p>We went over that, but it is another example disputing your theory of the IBT ignoring pension issues. </p><p>A better question is what would've been the impact on the CSPF had none of those 22.3's been negotiated? </p><p>Tell me to which plan do you provide actuarial service?</p><p>That's another wild claim of which you have no knowledge and is simply false. </p><p>The existing contribution plus the increase helps every plan, regardless of funding status.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 3630986, member: 37112"] IDK whether the amount is enough, but you proposed the union wasn't doing anything. You also posted the guaranteed Feeder jobs that are now being brokered or tendered to the RR for transit. If the 22.4 scheme is approved those also will be FT jobs and bennies. Any increase in funding is better than no increase. PT is and in many cases has been under the single employer UPS plan. Their rules re: funding are different. We went over that, but it is another example disputing your theory of the IBT ignoring pension issues. A better question is what would've been the impact on the CSPF had none of those 22.3's been negotiated? Tell me to which plan do you provide actuarial service? That's another wild claim of which you have no knowledge and is simply false. The existing contribution plus the increase helps every plan, regardless of funding status. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
1997 Strike. Old heads only. On Topic.
Top