Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
1997 Strike. Old heads only. On Topic.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DELACROIX" data-source="post: 3634502" data-attributes="member: 49065"><p>I am in the package division and really not up to date on the new feeder language in this contract, I do not remember saying anything about Rail or Brokers. If there is any gain in full time jobs it is a plus I agree whole hardly with that statement. </p><p></p><p>I am in the Central and all our part timers are under the UPS Pension Plan. I noticed that if everybody is getting a 1 dollar increase total in our benefit plans and the part timers are only getting a .30 cent hourly increase in Health and Welfare is that remaining .70 cent hourly increase going toward their Pension? If so why wasn't their pension increased in the same manner as the most of the full timers, seems strange.</p><p></p><p>Correct the CSPF would be in worse shape if it wasn't for those 10,000 new inside jobs created after the "97" strike. </p><p></p><p>I should of posed the question better and put "Will the hourly increase of .50 cents annually be able to maintain or improve our Pension and Health and Welfare benefits?" (We really cannot see till all the Supplements and Riders are in), there is still a lot of TBA language under Article 34 regarding our benefit packages. If Healthcare cost goes down we win, if it increases we lose, we can't predict the future.</p><p></p><p>Most of us are reacting to half truths, rumors and lack of any true information so give grace to a lot of us who are spouting off, or grinding their axes. I believe that this contract is going to be extended for a long, long time, everybody be prepared for this. How it plays out will be interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DELACROIX, post: 3634502, member: 49065"] I am in the package division and really not up to date on the new feeder language in this contract, I do not remember saying anything about Rail or Brokers. If there is any gain in full time jobs it is a plus I agree whole hardly with that statement. I am in the Central and all our part timers are under the UPS Pension Plan. I noticed that if everybody is getting a 1 dollar increase total in our benefit plans and the part timers are only getting a .30 cent hourly increase in Health and Welfare is that remaining .70 cent hourly increase going toward their Pension? If so why wasn't their pension increased in the same manner as the most of the full timers, seems strange. Correct the CSPF would be in worse shape if it wasn't for those 10,000 new inside jobs created after the "97" strike. I should of posed the question better and put "Will the hourly increase of .50 cents annually be able to maintain or improve our Pension and Health and Welfare benefits?" (We really cannot see till all the Supplements and Riders are in), there is still a lot of TBA language under Article 34 regarding our benefit packages. If Healthcare cost goes down we win, if it increases we lose, we can't predict the future. Most of us are reacting to half truths, rumors and lack of any true information so give grace to a lot of us who are spouting off, or grinding their axes. I believe that this contract is going to be extended for a long, long time, everybody be prepared for this. How it plays out will be interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
1997 Strike. Old heads only. On Topic.
Top