Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
2020 Election
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 3866813" data-attributes="member: 58700"><p>what was apparent to me was that the judge gave both sides holy hell. </p><p></p><p>he strongly admonished Flynn for his lying to the point of disgust. </p><p>he strongly questioned the basis of the investigation and laughed at the prosecution when they tried to present the never charged never prosecuted logan act. </p><p></p><p>he asked pointed questions with his concern that flynn may have been advising the incoming administration while still working for the turks. that was stated by prosecution to be a non issue. He's a jurist who thought out loud as he asked those questions. he then realized that the CNN's and all their snowflake groupies would read much into the word treason and walked it back after the break you keep mentioning. </p><p></p><p>The judge clearly gave an indication that he may not accept the plea deal. At that point flynns lawyers decided to request delaying sentencing to build up more positive support for his testifying against the recently charged turks. </p><p></p><p>thats it. anything else you try to spin out of this tells us that you listen to too much CNN .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newfie, post: 3866813, member: 58700"] what was apparent to me was that the judge gave both sides holy hell. he strongly admonished Flynn for his lying to the point of disgust. he strongly questioned the basis of the investigation and laughed at the prosecution when they tried to present the never charged never prosecuted logan act. he asked pointed questions with his concern that flynn may have been advising the incoming administration while still working for the turks. that was stated by prosecution to be a non issue. He's a jurist who thought out loud as he asked those questions. he then realized that the CNN's and all their snowflake groupies would read much into the word treason and walked it back after the break you keep mentioning. The judge clearly gave an indication that he may not accept the plea deal. At that point flynns lawyers decided to request delaying sentencing to build up more positive support for his testifying against the recently charged turks. thats it. anything else you try to spin out of this tells us that you listen to too much CNN . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
2020 Election
Top