Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Facts/Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 178017" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>This what I'm not understanding. The language I quoted ("No part-time employee shall be laid off OR SUFFER THE LOSS OF A JOB as a result of creating a full-time job...") certainly seems to say no bid air driver should lose his job to create a 22.3 job. Did any of them grieve on that basis? Have you talked to your BA about whether losing your ECS clerk job to one shift of a new 22.3 contravenes that language?</p><p> </p><p>If the language I quoted is now universally ignored, the way I think it would have to work is: (a) UPS would create a 22.3 from your job and another existing pt job; (b) The new combo job would go up for seniority bid by fulltimers -- partimers couldn't bid for it until the fulltimers had passed on it. The point being that the customer counter clerk (assuming he's a combo 22.3) couldn't just bid for your shift, keeping his other -- he'd be bidding out of both his shifts into two new jobs.</p><p> </p><p>E.g., my 22.3 has a NUMBER on the reports, and two parts: "Capture" (ODC) on Twilight and "Hub Sort" (loading, in my case) on Night. Despite the generic name for the night work I'm told that there's precedent to say I can't even go from loading to main sort (which would also be called "Hub Sort" on the report, I believe) without bidding into a different numbered 22.3... I'm trying to confirm this...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 178017, member: 9310"] This what I'm not understanding. The language I quoted ("No part-time employee shall be laid off OR SUFFER THE LOSS OF A JOB as a result of creating a full-time job...") certainly seems to say no bid air driver should lose his job to create a 22.3 job. Did any of them grieve on that basis? Have you talked to your BA about whether losing your ECS clerk job to one shift of a new 22.3 contravenes that language? If the language I quoted is now universally ignored, the way I think it would have to work is: (a) UPS would create a 22.3 from your job and another existing pt job; (b) The new combo job would go up for seniority bid by fulltimers -- partimers couldn't bid for it until the fulltimers had passed on it. The point being that the customer counter clerk (assuming he's a combo 22.3) couldn't just bid for your shift, keeping his other -- he'd be bidding out of both his shifts into two new jobs. E.g., my 22.3 has a NUMBER on the reports, and two parts: "Capture" (ODC) on Twilight and "Hub Sort" (loading, in my case) on Night. Despite the generic name for the night work I'm told that there's precedent to say I can't even go from loading to main sort (which would also be called "Hub Sort" on the report, I believe) without bidding into a different numbered 22.3... I'm trying to confirm this... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Facts/Origins
Top