Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
22.4 Lay-off—Need some understanding
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 4386853" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Apparently it wouldn’t matter. I’ve already been told the union would never allow the change I mentioned.</p><p></p><p>Screw the non voters. They should have no bearing on the results. It’s better to ignore their inaction and force them to vote later if they don’t like the results than to ignore the actual voters instead. The latter makes about as much since as a football bat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They passed a NO as a yes. Yes, we all understand that they are, conveniently, not required to abide by the results due to their silly (or downright crazy) rule set forth in 1991. But logic says that choosing non voters over voters is counterproductive. Those MFs will likely never vote again. Why would they? The current system only weakens the union even more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 4386853, member: 198"] Apparently it wouldn’t matter. I’ve already been told the union would never allow the change I mentioned. Screw the non voters. They should have no bearing on the results. It’s better to ignore their inaction and force them to vote later if they don’t like the results than to ignore the actual voters instead. The latter makes about as much since as a football bat. They passed a NO as a yes. Yes, we all understand that they are, conveniently, not required to abide by the results due to their silly (or downright crazy) rule set forth in 1991. But logic says that choosing non voters over voters is counterproductive. Those MFs will likely never vote again. Why would they? The current system only weakens the union even more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
22.4 Lay-off—Need some understanding
Top