Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
3 Regions, 20 Districts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawaii50" data-source="post: 667565" data-attributes="member: 15838"><p>He also was in charge of OPL. Do you still have your prospectus when Davis was in charge of OPL? Look at numbers at see what he did. </p><p> </p><p>12-31-2008, 04:33 PM <strong>Management (ERO) Early Retirement Offer </strong></p><p>From "Myron" I cherry picked the quotes. Cause I found some it interesting. </p><p> </p><p>Early retirement package? Why again? The game is set up for as many people as possible to NOT make at least partial retirement as possible AND<strong> it's getting worse.</strong> Remember, <em>55 is NOT full retirement. It is a partial benefit retirement with full healthcare</em>. </p><p></p><p>It used to be, UPS saved enormous costs by losing people before they reached full retirement. Go ahead leave before 62 take your stock you have enough! They begged you. </p><p></p><p>Now the age is 55. I have seen so many uncomfortable moves made to people when they reach 54 to 56 years of age it would make your head spin. </p><p></p><p>There are many age related savings UPS has been successful in adapting without a whimper of lawsuit. Who in their right mind would take UPS on? </p><p>They only promote people in their 30's and only hire people in their 20's. Please wake up and take a look around. Do your own stroke count!! </p><p> </p><p>there is only really one way UPS can actually save money.<strong> Keep as many people from reaching partial or full retirement as possible</strong>. It's not like they are running around saying, "We need to get rid of old people". </p><p> </p><p> The 1800 management that will be cut. I wonder how many of the 1800 will have full or partial benefits?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawaii50, post: 667565, member: 15838"] He also was in charge of OPL. Do you still have your prospectus when Davis was in charge of OPL? Look at numbers at see what he did. 12-31-2008, 04:33 PM [B]Management (ERO) Early Retirement Offer [/B] From "Myron" I cherry picked the quotes. Cause I found some it interesting. Early retirement package? Why again? The game is set up for as many people as possible to NOT make at least partial retirement as possible AND[B] it's getting worse.[/B] Remember, [I]55 is NOT full retirement. It is a partial benefit retirement with full healthcare[/I]. It used to be, UPS saved enormous costs by losing people before they reached full retirement. Go ahead leave before 62 take your stock you have enough! They begged you. Now the age is 55. I have seen so many uncomfortable moves made to people when they reach 54 to 56 years of age it would make your head spin. There are many age related savings UPS has been successful in adapting without a whimper of lawsuit. Who in their right mind would take UPS on? They only promote people in their 30's and only hire people in their 20's. Please wake up and take a look around. Do your own stroke count!! there is only really one way UPS can actually save money.[B] Keep as many people from reaching partial or full retirement as possible[/B]. It's not like they are running around saying, "We need to get rid of old people". The 1800 management that will be cut. I wonder how many of the 1800 will have full or partial benefits? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
3 Regions, 20 Districts
Top