Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
3rd Vote
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 1282624" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p><em><strong>Who are you trying to kid, it's already happening, through attrition?</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>Full time employees aren't being replaced as it is, and the new single day vacation driver language in the Central Region Supplement is going to make full time opportunities even more scarce.</strong></em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em><strong>So is the company contributing the same amount of $ for a part time employee as they are for a full time employee to the Central States H&W fund?</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>Would these same part time employees be eligible for these "subsides" if this were not a TH plan.</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>Could this be a mirage for part time employees who think this to be a good thing, only to have the rug pulled out from under them when presented with ever increasing annual deductibles?</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>Part timers will be economically crippled with deductibles.</strong></em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>If overall H&W costs "lower", it will be the first thing that has happened under the ACA that was supposed to, and the first time it has lowered...<span style="font-size: 15px">ever</span>?</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Reality dictates that advancement in medicine costs money.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Who better to shoulder the burden, but the companies that benefit from the fruit of healthier employees?</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>To proceed as if H&W costs will ever "lower", is irresponsible.</em></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>This letter in its entirety, coupled with the "Big Picture" of this concessionary contract, illustrates the gaping holes we are facing going forward if this Master is ever signed off on. </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 1282624, member: 14176"] [I][B]Who are you trying to kid, it's already happening, through attrition? Full time employees aren't being replaced as it is, and the new single day vacation driver language in the Central Region Supplement is going to make full time opportunities even more scarce.[/B][/I] [I][B]So is the company contributing the same amount of $ for a part time employee as they are for a full time employee to the Central States H&W fund? Would these same part time employees be eligible for these "subsides" if this were not a TH plan. Could this be a mirage for part time employees who think this to be a good thing, only to have the rug pulled out from under them when presented with ever increasing annual deductibles? Part timers will be economically crippled with deductibles.[/B][/I] [B][I]If overall H&W costs "lower", it will be the first thing that has happened under the ACA that was supposed to, and the first time it has lowered...[SIZE=4]ever[/SIZE]? Reality dictates that advancement in medicine costs money. Who better to shoulder the burden, but the companies that benefit from the fruit of healthier employees? To proceed as if H&W costs will ever "lower", is irresponsible.[/I][/B] [B][I]This letter in its entirety, coupled with the "Big Picture" of this concessionary contract, illustrates the gaping holes we are facing going forward if this Master is ever signed off on. [/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
3rd Vote
Top