Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
50 Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 105315" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Very true Tie. <strong><em><u>Everyone</u></em></strong> has an agenda, even Susie. Her problem is she's not for placing all ideas on the table to discuss and only wants the ideas that she approves of to get any "net play!" I may not agree with her and agree with you and even visa-versa and you and I have probably disagreed more than agreed in the arena of politics, etc. but I still afford you the respect to post and express your ideas no matter what they were and I hope you will call me on it if I ever violate that condition.</p><p> </p><p>Sure I saw the questions on Neal Boortz' site and for the record I think Neal is a libertarian sellout to the Neocons but I stll felt many of those questions were very valid to consider with one's overall thought and still consider them good questions for anyone to ask themselves no matter their political beliefs. Susie likes to accuse many of being Fascist and yes, <strong><em><u>we</u></em></strong> all can be that way at times and some more then others but I think it's a result of human nature and cultural conditions rather than pure ideological when we act this way but in Susie's case I think she's smart enough to know the difference but still wants to exert that thought process in the arena of ideas. I might at times act the fascist out of ignorance but she's a purist at heart IMO. This includes debasing herself to the level of name calling instead of ignoring admittedly stupid or unneeded remarks or rising above that level with some other intelligent remark that she is more than capable of. I agree MoreLuck's comment to Susie was unnecessary but the remark back from Susie calling Moreluck a "bigoted racist" was IMO totally uncalled for. Moreluck may have committed sin but IMO Susie's was the greater sin!</p><p> </p><p>Although I "respected" Susie (past tense and yes I know you and others can't understand that point of view but hey that's life pal) and in some areas agreed with her, I lost any respect after her departure and then her posts under aynomous names claiming to have been dismissed from the site by Cheryl only to have her recently reappear under the susie handle thus proving her claim was a lie. We then had the Slothrup days and even though Slothrup denied, I'm not one at this point to believe that denial. Yes, I do think Susie and Sloth were one and the same. With all the other events, I'm left with no other conclusion to come to as much as I might like to come to something else.</p><p> </p><p>It just came down to all these acts of questionable integrity (not her various beliefs whether I agreed or not) that just finally did it for me. She accused me under a veiled post of being Brutus to her Ceasar but I wonder if she ever considered the fact that she first weiled the knife of lies! I'm sure she never consider that point of view!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 105315, member: 2189"] Very true Tie. [B][I][U]Everyone[/U][/I][/B] has an agenda, even Susie. Her problem is she's not for placing all ideas on the table to discuss and only wants the ideas that she approves of to get any "net play!" I may not agree with her and agree with you and even visa-versa and you and I have probably disagreed more than agreed in the arena of politics, etc. but I still afford you the respect to post and express your ideas no matter what they were and I hope you will call me on it if I ever violate that condition. Sure I saw the questions on Neal Boortz' site and for the record I think Neal is a libertarian sellout to the Neocons but I stll felt many of those questions were very valid to consider with one's overall thought and still consider them good questions for anyone to ask themselves no matter their political beliefs. Susie likes to accuse many of being Fascist and yes, [B][I][U]we[/U][/I][/B] all can be that way at times and some more then others but I think it's a result of human nature and cultural conditions rather than pure ideological when we act this way but in Susie's case I think she's smart enough to know the difference but still wants to exert that thought process in the arena of ideas. I might at times act the fascist out of ignorance but she's a purist at heart IMO. This includes debasing herself to the level of name calling instead of ignoring admittedly stupid or unneeded remarks or rising above that level with some other intelligent remark that she is more than capable of. I agree MoreLuck's comment to Susie was unnecessary but the remark back from Susie calling Moreluck a "bigoted racist" was IMO totally uncalled for. Moreluck may have committed sin but IMO Susie's was the greater sin! Although I "respected" Susie (past tense and yes I know you and others can't understand that point of view but hey that's life pal) and in some areas agreed with her, I lost any respect after her departure and then her posts under aynomous names claiming to have been dismissed from the site by Cheryl only to have her recently reappear under the susie handle thus proving her claim was a lie. We then had the Slothrup days and even though Slothrup denied, I'm not one at this point to believe that denial. Yes, I do think Susie and Sloth were one and the same. With all the other events, I'm left with no other conclusion to come to as much as I might like to come to something else. It just came down to all these acts of questionable integrity (not her various beliefs whether I agreed or not) that just finally did it for me. She accused me under a veiled post of being Brutus to her Ceasar but I wonder if she ever considered the fact that she first weiled the knife of lies! I'm sure she never consider that point of view! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
50 Questions
Top