Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
70 hours
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick Ross" data-source="post: 4293466" data-attributes="member: 51847"><p>I know lawyers from both sides try to leave things ambiguous, but I can't think of a single reason the teamsters lawyers wouldn't force this language to be specific.</p><p></p><p>Unless they're going to side with the company as another concession, and wanted this to be vague so they could entice more people to vote Yes or not vote at all.</p><p></p><p>it doesn't make me happy to think I pay over $1,000 a year for this <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> show...</p><p></p><p>Best contract ever!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick Ross, post: 4293466, member: 51847"] I know lawyers from both sides try to leave things ambiguous, but I can't think of a single reason the teamsters lawyers wouldn't force this language to be specific. Unless they're going to side with the company as another concession, and wanted this to be vague so they could entice more people to vote Yes or not vote at all. it doesn't make me happy to think I pay over $1,000 a year for this :censored: show... Best contract ever!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
70 hours
Top
