Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
A sincere warning to all current and prospective contractors.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="59 Dano" data-source="post: 3908825" data-attributes="member: 23516"><p>Yes, I read the link. Did you?</p><p></p><p>"McDonald’s said it has reached a settlement with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which <strong><em><u>accused </u></em></strong>the chain of unfair labor practices as “joint employer” of its franchisees’ workers."</p><p></p><p>"The NLRB eventually issued complaints against McDonald’s. The board <strong><em><u>alleged</u></em></strong> McDonald's was a “joint employer” of its franchisees’ employees, and it was therefore liable for their treatment."</p><p></p><p>The case was being argued in front of a JUDGE, who would make the determination as to whether McD's was a joint employer or not, and liable/not liable for the damages sought. There are a million references to this case on the web and the only instance in which it is said that they were "ruled" to be joint employers is when you said it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="59 Dano, post: 3908825, member: 23516"] Yes, I read the link. Did you? "McDonald’s said it has reached a settlement with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which [B][I][U]accused [/U][/I][/B]the chain of unfair labor practices as “joint employer” of its franchisees’ workers." "The NLRB eventually issued complaints against McDonald’s. The board [B][I][U]alleged[/U][/I][/B] McDonald's was a “joint employer” of its franchisees’ employees, and it was therefore liable for their treatment." The case was being argued in front of a JUDGE, who would make the determination as to whether McD's was a joint employer or not, and liable/not liable for the damages sought. There are a million references to this case on the web and the only instance in which it is said that they were "ruled" to be joint employers is when you said it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
A sincere warning to all current and prospective contractors.
Top