Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Afghanistan war
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 606383" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Ill take it that you dont want to get pinned down on an answer, because you know it will always zero back onto GW BUSH's failure to lead in afghanistan.</p><p> </p><p>So far, Afghanistan has been a huge waste of time.</p><p> </p><p>This last election was chockfull of corruption, corruption we support in order to keep President Karzai in office. </p><p> </p><p>Our men have fought valiantly in both wars, yet the goal will always elude their deaths. </p><p> </p><p>The problem with answering the question asked begins and ends with politics. The right wing has to find a way to turn the "war on terror" they sold to those in this country into a "liberal" failure of leadership.</p><p> </p><p>Bush had control of the white house, the republicans had control of congress and all the purse strings, yet they failed to have a plan for success in either war.</p><p> </p><p>Bomb,bomb,bomb, shock and awe, blah blah blah......7 years later, its worse than ever. Now, a new president , a new congress has to decide to fight to save "political face" or cut bait. </p><p> </p><p>Bill Orielly, who I will never accuse of being intelligent said the other night that staying in afghanistan and fighting until an eventual win will make us "look" like we won, vs leaving and letting the "terrrorists" think they "won" is better for america.</p><p> </p><p>This is why we shouldnt start wars we cant end. His statement is a purely political one. He could care less how many soldiers are killed, or how much red ink is booked, as long as it appears like we won, he's all for it.</p><p> </p><p>So AV8, answer the question, youve been put in charge, you are the "pretend" commander in chief, HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THERE?</p><p> </p><p>Now that youve been promoted, stop the line dance, put down the american flag, stop cleaning your gun and answer the question.</p><p> </p><p>You decide whether you want a political end, or a military end, the choice is all yours, we are all listening.</p><p> </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/peaceful.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":peaceful:" title="Peaceful :peaceful:" data-shortname=":peaceful:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 606383, member: 17969"] Ill take it that you dont want to get pinned down on an answer, because you know it will always zero back onto GW BUSH's failure to lead in afghanistan. So far, Afghanistan has been a huge waste of time. This last election was chockfull of corruption, corruption we support in order to keep President Karzai in office. Our men have fought valiantly in both wars, yet the goal will always elude their deaths. The problem with answering the question asked begins and ends with politics. The right wing has to find a way to turn the "war on terror" they sold to those in this country into a "liberal" failure of leadership. Bush had control of the white house, the republicans had control of congress and all the purse strings, yet they failed to have a plan for success in either war. Bomb,bomb,bomb, shock and awe, blah blah blah......7 years later, its worse than ever. Now, a new president , a new congress has to decide to fight to save "political face" or cut bait. Bill Orielly, who I will never accuse of being intelligent said the other night that staying in afghanistan and fighting until an eventual win will make us "look" like we won, vs leaving and letting the "terrrorists" think they "won" is better for america. This is why we shouldnt start wars we cant end. His statement is a purely political one. He could care less how many soldiers are killed, or how much red ink is booked, as long as it appears like we won, he's all for it. So AV8, answer the question, youve been put in charge, you are the "pretend" commander in chief, HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THERE? Now that youve been promoted, stop the line dance, put down the american flag, stop cleaning your gun and answer the question. You decide whether you want a political end, or a military end, the choice is all yours, we are all listening. :peaceful: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Afghanistan war
Top