Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Afghanistan war
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 644714" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>No comment because I don't think I need too!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p> </p><p>Note to self, consider the possible and principle <a href="http://dangerousintersection.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/grocery-store-magazine-at-checkout-aisle-lo-res.jpg" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">information sources</span> </a>in the future of this poster. Price check on isle 5!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Will we see links in the future from <a href="http://antiwar.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Antiwar.com</span> </a>too? </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/surprised.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":surprised:" title="Surprised :surprised:" data-shortname=":surprised:" /></p><p> </p><p>Could we even see links to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34209743/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">this guy</span></a>? Looking at the rulebook (a certain poster's rule book) linking a story at Salon or other "alleged" (his belief) "LIBERAL" website would invoke the "liberal" rule and I also find it interesting had Joan Walsh showed up here at BC and offered an opinion, who would be the first here to attack with the "liberal" verbal missles? </p><p> </p><p>Hmmm, need to look back in the archives and see what some here said when Rumy refused to put more boots on the ground. This Afghan "surge" seems aweful similar to another "Surge" ironically called "The New Way Forward" and like this recent action, was announced to the nation in a national TV address on Jan. 10, 2007. A surge to my memory that was cheered and welcomed. This was after the democrats took over Congress and Bush got Rumy (the guy who refused to "esculate") out of the way and then put in a man who started learning the ropes actually in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/washington/09gates.html?ei=5090&en=21fda2badc00b48f&ex=1320728400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1163106147-BQMHnDe6SJCh/ACdSB63Sw" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Carter adminstration</span> </a>only later to serve in broader republican efforts. Now we have Obama doing in effect the same thing as a previous adminstration and we have folks who think anyone antiwar is some type of lesser than human maroon now using their (the antiwar) opinions to advance their (our BC republicans) political agenda. The President ramps up war which they love and fully endorse yet they display a contempt for the current President who does exactly like the previous guy. But then inconsistency and pure hypocrisy is not a trait found missing here so there you go!</p><p> </p><p>There's a galaxy of stuff not to like about Obama and I don't, he flat $ux IMO but then so did Bush so again, <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>there you go!</strong></span> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I think you both have it a bit wrong on the historical timeline but then the truth just doesn't work the same when the real purpose is to drive a certain political narrative!</p><p> </p><p>BTW: You democrats uh correction, "thinking democrats" who claim to be out to defend the poor and oppressed souls (noble cause it may be) should take a real serious look at Zebig's words above. Boiled down to hard truth, we used a nation of people as pure cannon folder, poor and oppressed people I might add, for ourselves to achieve and benefit from a political end. An end I might add was more about bidness and economic domination than pure military defense of a real and actual threat. 2 empire bullies going head to head to dominate the post WW2 world for the sake of filthy lucer and nothing more. This immoral, unethical use of people proudly crowed above by ole' Zebig was done by a President who claims to be a champion of human rights and defending human dignity. </p><p> </p><p>Now Obama talks of a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/18/AR2009031802313.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">civilian surge</span> </a>and what comes to mind is KBR, Halliburton and let's not forget the democrats blood soaked hands of their own <span style="color: red">Daddy Warbucks </span><span style="color: black">not to mention his and Mrs. Warbucks <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/21/senate-husbands-firm-cashes-in-on-crisis/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">benefitting</span></a> from the current economic malise. Are you sure you really did vote out those horrible, evil, nasty capitialist republicans? Don't look now democrats but the man you voted for change and transparency is now a full partner in the <a href="http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/oil_war.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">real designs</span> </a>of warcraft in the Middle East!</span></p><p> </p><p>The people who do/did/does this kind of stuff you tell us will help and protect us from all manner of those out to do us harm. You better realize at the end of the day that the folks in office whether there is a "D" or an "R" behind their names are no different. They are scoundrels of the lowest order because power and pure moral corruption will only attract the lowest order human in the first place!</p><p> </p><p>If many of us can admit we got conned in the early 80's by republicans and Reagan, <a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/50900" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">the so-called conservative</span></a> it's time other good people admit the democrats and Obama are pulling a similar con job. Keep you eyes open and watch the facts as we go forward as the truth will be there to see.</p><p> </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/peaceful.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":peaceful:" title="Peaceful :peaceful:" data-shortname=":peaceful:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 644714, member: 2189"] No comment because I don't think I need too! :wink2: Note to self, consider the possible and principle [URL="http://dangerousintersection.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/grocery-store-magazine-at-checkout-aisle-lo-res.jpg"][COLOR=red]information sources[/COLOR] [/URL]in the future of this poster. Price check on isle 5! :happy-very: Will we see links in the future from [URL="http://antiwar.com/"][COLOR=red]Antiwar.com[/COLOR] [/URL]too? :surprised: Could we even see links to [URL="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34209743/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/"][COLOR=red]this guy[/COLOR][/URL]? Looking at the rulebook (a certain poster's rule book) linking a story at Salon or other "alleged" (his belief) "LIBERAL" website would invoke the "liberal" rule and I also find it interesting had Joan Walsh showed up here at BC and offered an opinion, who would be the first here to attack with the "liberal" verbal missles? Hmmm, need to look back in the archives and see what some here said when Rumy refused to put more boots on the ground. This Afghan "surge" seems aweful similar to another "Surge" ironically called "The New Way Forward" and like this recent action, was announced to the nation in a national TV address on Jan. 10, 2007. A surge to my memory that was cheered and welcomed. This was after the democrats took over Congress and Bush got Rumy (the guy who refused to "esculate") out of the way and then put in a man who started learning the ropes actually in the [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/washington/09gates.html?ei=5090&en=21fda2badc00b48f&ex=1320728400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1163106147-BQMHnDe6SJCh/ACdSB63Sw"][COLOR=red]Carter adminstration[/COLOR] [/URL]only later to serve in broader republican efforts. Now we have Obama doing in effect the same thing as a previous adminstration and we have folks who think anyone antiwar is some type of lesser than human maroon now using their (the antiwar) opinions to advance their (our BC republicans) political agenda. The President ramps up war which they love and fully endorse yet they display a contempt for the current President who does exactly like the previous guy. But then inconsistency and pure hypocrisy is not a trait found missing here so there you go! There's a galaxy of stuff not to like about Obama and I don't, he flat $ux IMO but then so did Bush so again, [SIZE=3][B]there you go![/B][/SIZE] I think you both have it a bit wrong on the historical timeline but then the truth just doesn't work the same when the real purpose is to drive a certain political narrative! BTW: You democrats uh correction, "thinking democrats" who claim to be out to defend the poor and oppressed souls (noble cause it may be) should take a real serious look at Zebig's words above. Boiled down to hard truth, we used a nation of people as pure cannon folder, poor and oppressed people I might add, for ourselves to achieve and benefit from a political end. An end I might add was more about bidness and economic domination than pure military defense of a real and actual threat. 2 empire bullies going head to head to dominate the post WW2 world for the sake of filthy lucer and nothing more. This immoral, unethical use of people proudly crowed above by ole' Zebig was done by a President who claims to be a champion of human rights and defending human dignity. Now Obama talks of a [URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/18/AR2009031802313.html"][COLOR=red]civilian surge[/COLOR] [/URL]and what comes to mind is KBR, Halliburton and let's not forget the democrats blood soaked hands of their own [COLOR=red]Daddy Warbucks [/COLOR][COLOR=black]not to mention his and Mrs. Warbucks [URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/21/senate-husbands-firm-cashes-in-on-crisis/"][COLOR=red]benefitting[/COLOR][/URL] from the current economic malise. Are you sure you really did vote out those horrible, evil, nasty capitialist republicans? Don't look now democrats but the man you voted for change and transparency is now a full partner in the [URL="http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/oil_war.htm"][COLOR=red]real designs[/COLOR] [/URL]of warcraft in the Middle East![/COLOR] The people who do/did/does this kind of stuff you tell us will help and protect us from all manner of those out to do us harm. You better realize at the end of the day that the folks in office whether there is a "D" or an "R" behind their names are no different. They are scoundrels of the lowest order because power and pure moral corruption will only attract the lowest order human in the first place! If many of us can admit we got conned in the early 80's by republicans and Reagan, [URL="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/50900"][COLOR=red]the so-called conservative[/COLOR][/URL] it's time other good people admit the democrats and Obama are pulling a similar con job. Keep you eyes open and watch the facts as we go forward as the truth will be there to see. :peaceful: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Afghanistan war
Top