Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Another View of Newt Gingrich
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 904812" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Even that can be skewed and unfair. Why not cost price each gov't service, like each serving in a cafeteria has an individual cost. Each one of us goes down the gov't cafeteria line, selects the services we want from gov't and at the end of the line we pay the tax burden to cover the cost of that gov't program. Just like a cafeteria line where you want the salad, mac & cheese and roast beef but don't want the cabbage and fried chicken, you only pay for the salad, mac & cheese and roast beef. Eating lite? Salad only? You only pay salad only. Fasting? Money stays in the pocket but then the risk is on you regardless of the outcome if things go wrong.</p><p></p><p>People who want a nanny state can have it, people who want minimal state can have that and people who want no state can have that too! Everybody get's what they want, what's wrong with that? <a href="http://www.panarchy.org/indexes/panarchy.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">Panarchy</span></a> if you will.</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p></p><p>Another benefit for those who choose gov't services would be better and more effective service because the service will have to man up in order to keep existing customers and hopefully convince others to become customers. Bad or ineffective service and taxpayers will make other choices in the TAXeteria line. And any debt created to benefit a gov't service, only those customers at the time the debt was created are liable to the debt service. Future customers or non-customers are not saddle with or responsible for any debt created.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 904812, member: 2189"] Even that can be skewed and unfair. Why not cost price each gov't service, like each serving in a cafeteria has an individual cost. Each one of us goes down the gov't cafeteria line, selects the services we want from gov't and at the end of the line we pay the tax burden to cover the cost of that gov't program. Just like a cafeteria line where you want the salad, mac & cheese and roast beef but don't want the cabbage and fried chicken, you only pay for the salad, mac & cheese and roast beef. Eating lite? Salad only? You only pay salad only. Fasting? Money stays in the pocket but then the risk is on you regardless of the outcome if things go wrong. People who want a nanny state can have it, people who want minimal state can have that and people who want no state can have that too! Everybody get's what they want, what's wrong with that? [URL="http://www.panarchy.org/indexes/panarchy.html"][COLOR=#ff0000]Panarchy[/COLOR][/URL] if you will. :wink2: Another benefit for those who choose gov't services would be better and more effective service because the service will have to man up in order to keep existing customers and hopefully convince others to become customers. Bad or ineffective service and taxpayers will make other choices in the TAXeteria line. And any debt created to benefit a gov't service, only those customers at the time the debt was created are liable to the debt service. Future customers or non-customers are not saddle with or responsible for any debt created. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Another View of Newt Gingrich
Top