Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
APWA Pension Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fullhouse" data-source="post: 188028" data-attributes="member: 9653"><p>705 Are you located in Chicago? What pension fund are you in? I thought I read somewhere in this forum that your crowd changed pension funds. Is this correct? Is your current fund a multi-employer fund? Is your fund on firm finacial ground? Oh! buy the way I notice union busting has been thrown around alot in these forums and has been directed to APWA. I just want to make one statement about that. Seems to me if a leader takes care of (just rough estimates) 60% of the members and leaves the other 40% to swallow pension cuts. He is not representing the best intrest of ALL his members, thus giving the 40% the impression that unity does not matter.In a sense one could label that leader a "union buster". We need to adopt a very common phrase and make it our motto. <strong>"all for one and one for all"</strong> </p><p> If there was true dedication? Hoffa would have never left the back door of the palace open.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fullhouse, post: 188028, member: 9653"] 705 Are you located in Chicago? What pension fund are you in? I thought I read somewhere in this forum that your crowd changed pension funds. Is this correct? Is your current fund a multi-employer fund? Is your fund on firm finacial ground? Oh! buy the way I notice union busting has been thrown around alot in these forums and has been directed to APWA. I just want to make one statement about that. Seems to me if a leader takes care of (just rough estimates) 60% of the members and leaves the other 40% to swallow pension cuts. He is not representing the best intrest of ALL his members, thus giving the 40% the impression that unity does not matter.In a sense one could label that leader a "union buster". We need to adopt a very common phrase and make it our motto. [B]"all for one and one for all"[/B] If there was true dedication? Hoffa would have never left the back door of the palace open. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
APWA Pension Challenge
Top