Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tonyexpress" data-source="post: 3521359" data-attributes="member: 1940">You said UPS should slash their dividend. How about all the hard working UPSers that own UPS stock?&nbsp; You want to cut their income?<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/halfdead.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":halfdead:" title="Halfdead&nbsp; &nbsp; :halfdead:" data-shortname=":halfdead:" /> Slashing the dividend is a terrible idea.Your exchanging stock idea is not well thought out either. UPS has paid a larger dividend than FedEx for many years, it isn&#039;t always about the stock appreciation. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/raspberry.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":raspberry:" title="Raspberry&nbsp; &nbsp; :raspberry:" data-shortname=":raspberry:" />Also, not sure why anyone would vote no for the authorization either. You are just giving away your leverage to bargain with UPS. Voting yes is a no brainer.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tonyexpress, post: 3521359, member: 1940"] You said UPS should slash their dividend. How about all the hard working UPSers that own UPS stock? You want to cut their income?:halfdead: Slashing the dividend is a terrible idea. Your exchanging stock idea is not well thought out either. UPS has paid a larger dividend than FedEx for many years, it isn't always about the stock appreciation. :raspberry: Also, not sure why anyone would vote no for the authorization either. You are just giving away your leverage to bargain with UPS. Voting yes is a no brainer. [/QUOTE]

Verification