Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4139483" data-attributes="member: 68849">Understood, My agreement was with his statement, not the particular situation, I should have been clearer, my mistake. I will rectify my mistake now.[USER=22662]@bbsam[/USER] in that post you did come to a conclusion, you certainly made assumptions, I had no idea of the basis or grounding of these assumptions in my initial post to you [USER=22662]@bbsam[/USER]. In your response to me you mentioned his previous postings, his posting history as grounds for your claim. You stated you may be wrong, agreed, you may be, kinda a definition of an assumption, one you served. [USER=58700]@newfie[/USER], I tag you because you gave my post a funny, I can understand why you did, you now see my thinking.The fact is, no one has any idea what the flusher does, and that is how it is supposed to be, another fact is you did assume something, exactly why I called you on it.Fact three constructive criticism is useful, that is what I agreed to, nothing more nothing less. Constructive criticism, by definition is criticism designed to build upon, not tear down.Thanks for calling me on it flusher, thanks [USER=58700]@newfie[/USER] for the funny, I did think about what I posted immediately after your funny appeared.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4139483, member: 68849"] Understood, My agreement was with his statement, not the particular situation, I should have been clearer, my mistake. I will rectify my mistake now. [USER=22662]@bbsam[/USER] in that post you did come to a conclusion, you certainly made assumptions, I had no idea of the basis or grounding of these assumptions in my initial post to you [USER=22662]@bbsam[/USER]. In your response to me you mentioned his previous postings, his posting history as grounds for your claim. You stated you may be wrong, agreed, you may be, kinda a definition of an assumption, one you served. [USER=58700]@newfie[/USER], I tag you because you gave my post a funny, I can understand why you did, you now see my thinking. The fact is, no one has any idea what the flusher does, and that is how it is supposed to be, another fact is you did assume something, exactly why I called you on it. Fact three constructive criticism is useful, that is what I agreed to, nothing more nothing less. Constructive criticism, by definition is criticism designed to build upon, not tear down. Thanks for calling me on it flusher, thanks [USER=58700]@newfie[/USER] for the funny, I did think about what I posted immediately after your funny appeared. [/QUOTE]

Verification