Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Atlanta DA Paul Howard Is A Political Whore - Rayshard Brooks Case Prosecution Announcement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheRat63" data-source="post: 4531589" data-attributes="member: 80699"><p>U really think ANY RESISTANCE to police warrants getting shot in the back while trying to literally escape the situation. He disarmed him (NON LETHAL WEAPON) and he ran away. Using a lethal weapon to kill him at that point is not equal or proportional force at all, it is excessive. At that moment when he shot him was there an immediate threat of great bodily harm or loss of life for any of those officers?</p><p></p><p>Edit* “All uses of lethal and non- or lesser-lethal physical force by government agents must be reasonable under the circumstances. This is not only wise policy, it is a constitutional demand. Reasonableness is required either by the Fourth Amendment or by the general constitutional demand that all government action be reasonable and non-arbitrary. In this context, the latter reasonableness requirement—that all government action be reasonable and non-arbitrary—can also be based in the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments which protect against government infringements of personal liberty, including the infliction of physical injury.”</p><p></p><p>if shooting somebody with back turned running away from you is reasonable then we disagree and ill pray for u</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheRat63, post: 4531589, member: 80699"] U really think ANY RESISTANCE to police warrants getting shot in the back while trying to literally escape the situation. He disarmed him (NON LETHAL WEAPON) and he ran away. Using a lethal weapon to kill him at that point is not equal or proportional force at all, it is excessive. At that moment when he shot him was there an immediate threat of great bodily harm or loss of life for any of those officers? Edit* “All uses of lethal and non- or lesser-lethal physical force by government agents must be reasonable under the circumstances. This is not only wise policy, it is a constitutional demand. Reasonableness is required either by the Fourth Amendment or by the general constitutional demand that all government action be reasonable and non-arbitrary. In this context, the latter reasonableness requirement—that all government action be reasonable and non-arbitrary—can also be based in the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments which protect against government infringements of personal liberty, including the infliction of physical injury.” if shooting somebody with back turned running away from you is reasonable then we disagree and ill pray for u [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Atlanta DA Paul Howard Is A Political Whore - Rayshard Brooks Case Prosecution Announcement
Top