Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Audit the Fed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 607998" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Of recent, there has been great debate about the future of healthcare in this country and in that debate are claims that opposition to certain directions are funded by vested interests who benefit if certain outcomes are taken or not taken. </p><p> </p><p>Now this post is not about healthcare but rather I make the point following into this. When it comes to economics and banking, the vast majority of those in the field of education and research tend to consistently back and advocate the status quo and oppose any effort to do otherwise. However, would these same people be taken as serious or found to have damaged credibility if like say some in healthcare who are found as we say "in the pay of" certain interests who would greatly benefit?</p><p> </p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/07/priceless-how-the-federal_n_278805.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Priceless, How the Federal Reserve Bought the Economics Profession</span></a></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">and from a pdf of 2005' Study from George Mason University</span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><a href="http://www.aier.org/ejw/archive/doc_view/3647-ejw-200508?tmpl=component&format=raw" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">The Federal Reserve System’s Influence on Research in Monetary Economics LAWRENCE H. WHITE* </span></a></span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">When it comes to healthcare and the claims of some that certain interests are afoot in mounting oppostion I'm more inclined to see an idustry playing a type of Jeckyl and Hyde if anything but I'd concur with those that if manipulation is taking place in the public space, it's wrong, should be exposed and condemned. That said, where are those same voices who decry fraud and mischief on the backs of the poor and less fortunate in healthcare when it comes to the even greater issue of banking, monetary policy and economics? Does one not consider where the cost of healthcare might be if our entire monetary system was honest and true free market?</span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">One condemns the evil of Rome's lions in eating the hapless christians while at the same time the same "one" is throwing into the arena those same hapless christians!</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 607998, member: 2189"] Of recent, there has been great debate about the future of healthcare in this country and in that debate are claims that opposition to certain directions are funded by vested interests who benefit if certain outcomes are taken or not taken. Now this post is not about healthcare but rather I make the point following into this. When it comes to economics and banking, the vast majority of those in the field of education and research tend to consistently back and advocate the status quo and oppose any effort to do otherwise. However, would these same people be taken as serious or found to have damaged credibility if like say some in healthcare who are found as we say "in the pay of" certain interests who would greatly benefit? [COLOR=#000000][URL="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/07/priceless-how-the-federal_n_278805.html"][COLOR=red]Priceless, How the Federal Reserve Bought the Economics Profession[/COLOR][/URL][/COLOR] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000]and from a pdf of 2005' Study from George Mason University[/COLOR][/LEFT] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000][URL="http://www.aier.org/ejw/archive/doc_view/3647-ejw-200508?tmpl=component&format=raw"][COLOR=red]The Federal Reserve System’s Influence on Research in Monetary Economics LAWRENCE H. WHITE* [/COLOR][/URL][/COLOR][/LEFT] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000]When it comes to healthcare and the claims of some that certain interests are afoot in mounting oppostion I'm more inclined to see an idustry playing a type of Jeckyl and Hyde if anything but I'd concur with those that if manipulation is taking place in the public space, it's wrong, should be exposed and condemned. That said, where are those same voices who decry fraud and mischief on the backs of the poor and less fortunate in healthcare when it comes to the even greater issue of banking, monetary policy and economics? Does one not consider where the cost of healthcare might be if our entire monetary system was honest and true free market?[/COLOR][/LEFT] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000]One condemns the evil of Rome's lions in eating the hapless christians while at the same time the same "one" is throwing into the arena those same hapless christians![/COLOR][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Audit the Fed
Top