Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Back-door way into Air Driver getting paid like non-Air Driver?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Socrates" data-source="post: 927392" data-attributes="member: 36964"><p>Damn it i thought i proof read this crap. Let me try this again:</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Article 1 Section 5 of the JC 28 Rider states: No PT employee receiving a higher rate of pay shall suffer a reduction of the hourly rate as a result of transferring to FT. They will receive increases as provided in the classification scale of wages, Article 17." -- Article 17 references <strong>Article 41</strong> (NMA) or FT non-Air drivers.</p><p></p><p>Kind of convoluted, but consider this:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Employee 1 is making $13 an hour. Starting Seniority pay for them would be $14.50, resulting in a raise. Thus it seems Article 40 Sec 6b would apply, and they'd be paid like Air Drivers. -- Employee 2 is making $15 an hour. Starting seniority pay for them would result in a pay cut to $14.50. -- So does this mean that they would be granted access to <strong>Article 41</strong>, as outlined in JC 28 Article 1 Section 5, which references JC 28 Article 17, which itself references <strong>Article 41</strong>?"</p><p></p><p>(The only Article 40 reference was supposed to be with the Employee 1 example.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>^^^^ This all doesn't apply to me, just a hypothetical. Basically, wishful thinking that sloppy writing would result in a bump to another classification.</p><p></p><p>In reality though, it would suck to have your red-circle/progression Full-Time hourly Rate be lower than it would be if you remained Part-Time with yearly split raises, which is the question-behind-the-question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Socrates, post: 927392, member: 36964"] Damn it i thought i proof read this crap. Let me try this again: "Article 1 Section 5 of the JC 28 Rider states: No PT employee receiving a higher rate of pay shall suffer a reduction of the hourly rate as a result of transferring to FT. They will receive increases as provided in the classification scale of wages, Article 17." -- Article 17 references [b]Article 41[/b] (NMA) or FT non-Air drivers. Kind of convoluted, but consider this: Employee 1 is making $13 an hour. Starting Seniority pay for them would be $14.50, resulting in a raise. Thus it seems Article 40 Sec 6b would apply, and they'd be paid like Air Drivers. -- Employee 2 is making $15 an hour. Starting seniority pay for them would result in a pay cut to $14.50. -- So does this mean that they would be granted access to [b]Article 41[/b], as outlined in JC 28 Article 1 Section 5, which references JC 28 Article 17, which itself references [b]Article 41[/b]?" (The only Article 40 reference was supposed to be with the Employee 1 example.) ^^^^ This all doesn't apply to me, just a hypothetical. Basically, wishful thinking that sloppy writing would result in a bump to another classification. In reality though, it would suck to have your red-circle/progression Full-Time hourly Rate be lower than it would be if you remained Part-Time with yearly split raises, which is the question-behind-the-question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Back-door way into Air Driver getting paid like non-Air Driver?
Top