Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Bargaining in good faith.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 3774676" data-attributes="member: 8481"><p>Finally. Someone asking the right question.</p><p></p><p>I am not so sure that Hoffa has the right to implement the supplements on the 2/3 majority basis just because less than half voted. The Master, yes. Supplements, I'm not so sure.</p><p></p><p>Section 2(d) Specifically refers to a Master Agreement when citing the 2/3, not supplemental agreements.</p><p></p><p>Article XII</p><p>Section 2(d)</p><p></p><p>Results of ratification or rejection votes with respect to <strong>master agreements</strong> shall be determined by all involved voting members on a cumulative basis of all votes cast as follows:</p><p></p><p>(1) If at least one half of the members eligible to vote cast valid ballots then a cumulative majority of those voting in favor of the final offer shall result in acceptance of such offer; and a cumulative majority of those voting against acceptance of the final offer shall authorize a strike without any additional vote being necessary for such strike authorization. A tie vote shall be resolved as provided in Section 1(b)(l) of this Article.</p><p></p><p>(2) If less than half of the eligible members cast valid ballots, then a two-thirds (2/3) vote of those voting shall be required to reject such final offer and to authorize a strike. The failure of such membership to reject the final offer and to authorize a strike as herein provided shall require the negotiating committee to accept such final offer or such additional provisions as can be negotiated by it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 3774676, member: 8481"] Finally. Someone asking the right question. I am not so sure that Hoffa has the right to implement the supplements on the 2/3 majority basis just because less than half voted. The Master, yes. Supplements, I'm not so sure. Section 2(d) Specifically refers to a Master Agreement when citing the 2/3, not supplemental agreements. Article XII Section 2(d) Results of ratification or rejection votes with respect to [B]master agreements[/B] shall be determined by all involved voting members on a cumulative basis of all votes cast as follows: (1) If at least one half of the members eligible to vote cast valid ballots then a cumulative majority of those voting in favor of the final offer shall result in acceptance of such offer; and a cumulative majority of those voting against acceptance of the final offer shall authorize a strike without any additional vote being necessary for such strike authorization. A tie vote shall be resolved as provided in Section 1(b)(l) of this Article. (2) If less than half of the eligible members cast valid ballots, then a two-thirds (2/3) vote of those voting shall be required to reject such final offer and to authorize a strike. The failure of such membership to reject the final offer and to authorize a strike as herein provided shall require the negotiating committee to accept such final offer or such additional provisions as can be negotiated by it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Bargaining in good faith.
Top