Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
BC Fantasy Football League
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tonyexpress" data-source="post: 1824192" data-attributes="member: 1940"><p>Just to be clear should the "flex" TE position be approved it would allow us to use a TE or WR in the TE position right?</p><p></p><p>Also the reason for my change in this ruling is because whether you have a good TE or not it does give you more flexibility. </p><p></p><p>For instance... if I have an awesome TE I can use him often and if he were to get injured or on a bye week it gives me some flexibility. Same thing if my TE sucks... I can use a WR or see if down the road I can acquire a better TE on waivers.</p><p></p><p>Am I missing something?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tonyexpress, post: 1824192, member: 1940"] Just to be clear should the "flex" TE position be approved it would allow us to use a TE or WR in the TE position right? Also the reason for my change in this ruling is because whether you have a good TE or not it does give you more flexibility. For instance... if I have an awesome TE I can use him often and if he were to get injured or on a bye week it gives me some flexibility. Same thing if my TE sucks... I can use a WR or see if down the road I can acquire a better TE on waivers. Am I missing something? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
BC Fantasy Football League
Top
